NASA's Apollo TV Lies Revealed - PART 1 - The Truth Behind The Tones

[Anaximander]

Hey guys,

This is something which I thin some of you might be interested in. It is a three part series concerning the dual purpose nature of the quindar tones that you heard during the Apollo missions. Please note that this is not Apollo hoax material, it is just a bit of info you might not know about or have considered before:

The Truth Behind The Tones - this multi-part series will begin to break down the truth about the incredible levels of manipulation and fakery that the Apollo lunar landing program TV footage was subjected to prior to being seen by public eyes.

This is some rather complex subject matter, and cannot be even close to adequately explained in a brief 10 minute video. Because of this, I think the best way to present proof of this magnitude is to do so methodically, explaining various primary facets of the manipulation in parts. This first part of the presentation focuses primarily on the initial basics of discrete recognition or rejection of objects in scene, which was the most important component of the Apollo GCTA-TV lie (but certainly not the only component - not by a long shot). Other presentations will cover many facets of the TV coverup, revealing not only how they did it, but why.

To the skeptics - I am NOT cherry-picking scenes here, and am not showing you only a few coincidentals from the hours of footage available. I have THOUSANDS of examples catalogued, and can and will back up what I am showing over and over and over again in coming presentations as I dissect this portion of the Apollo lie further. I will say right now that you have NO idea how deep the lies go, and you have NO idea what their true technological capabilities REALLY were back then - let alone today. I have researched this subject matter for years, I have personally interviewed an individual directly involved in this coverup, and I can back up what I am saying and showing here with countless examples. My intention however is not to overwhelm the viewer with examples (particularly due to the 10-minute-per-segment time constraints I am trying to adhere to), but rather it is to show and tell you what is really going on so that you can begin to analyze the TV footage for yourself. This is as REAL (and FAKE, if you get my drift) as it gets!
Stay tuned for Jose Escamilla's new motion picture documentary "MOON RISING", where we will go into much further depth about what is, without exaggeration, the most monumental coverup in human history. You have NO idea what you have been missing!

*Before the novice skeptic chimes in with the fact that lunacongita collaborates and is friends with Jose Escamilla, I'll point it out. I think we all have that one friend, you know the guy who is a little bit stupid and so we should allow lunacognita that bit of slack. It is probably a good thing for Escamilla to have such a friend. If Jose knew lunacognita back in the early 90's we might never have heard of rods, so please consider that.

 

[softbeard]

Yet another Apollo 'lunar conspiracy' theory. Man, those 60's acid trippers never give up.

 

[bbridges]

Not to sound too hopelessly credulous here, softbeard, but could you explain to me how you're ad hominem comment explains the data in the footage, so I'll know what you saw?

Yet another Apollo 'lunar conspiracy' theory. Man, those 60's acid trippers never give up.

 

[Bob Watson]

are you saying we NEVER went to the moon? OR are you saying that we went and we are covering up what we found there? the evidence for the former is swept away by the recent moon pics and there is ample evidence for the later...let us all know...

 

[Anaximander]

are you saying we NEVER went to the moon? OR are you saying that we went and we are covering up what we found there? the evidence for the former is swept away by the recent moon pics and there is ample evidence for the later...let us all know...

Don read it. Rich read it. Shit, I JUST re-read it.

Why won't you people read the goddamn OP? You'll post in the thread, but you won't read it? What's with that? Is it a hip new cool thing to do? ....Let us all know..

 

[bbridges]

I'm a bit confused about, what you are referring to when you say, "read it,Rich. do you mean the three video segments?I watched them and the analysis of the Quindar tones, and I was quite impressed with it, which is why I asked softbeard why he was so dismissive. I'm still a bit confused here, Anaximander.

 

[manxman]

i have read it and watched the vids, so why would they need to do what he says they are doing please.

 

[Anaximander]

Sorry for the confusion Rich.

The past tense is what I was using. Read as is pronounced Red, not Reed.

---------- Post added at 04:40 AM ---------- Previous post was at 02:41 AM ----------

i have read it and watched the vids, so why would they need to do what he says they are doing please.

Why do you think this would be done? There are only so many reasons why an agency would do this.

Anyhow, I'm not entirely sure how to answer your question. That is to say, I am not sure if that information is publicly available so I'm probably gonna have to chicken out on answering that for now.

If anything turns up, I'll let you know.

 

[bbridges]

It may help account for the odd public behavior of the lunar astronauts. How difficult and painful it must be for these remarkable men to face the public, try to appear and speak under directives that turn them into co-conspirators in a complicated,disingenous drama. I am not suggesting here that we didn't land on the moon-I'm almost positive that did take place. But everything about what happened while there appears to be grossly distorted. My hat is off to these men for having to play such an awkward, soul-sucking role when they risked so much for us.

 

[Bob Watson]

soo the tones are qued to sound when something enters or exits the frame..and this is proof that NASA found aliens up there? A cover up may be in place but I dont thing these have any thing to do with it....
Do you have CLEAR unmistakabe images from apollo showing...
1; ALIENS?
2;ALIEN STRUCTURES?
3;ALIEN SHIPS?
if you do post them up next I await your evidence!

 

[Anaximander]

This thread is just about the tones, I don't see why you should be invoking aliens.

 

[Decker]

soo the tones are qued to sound when something enters or exits the frame..and this is proof that NASA found aliens up there? A cover up may be in place but I dont thing these have any thing to do with it....
Do you have CLEAR unmistakabe images from apollo showing...
1; ALIENS?
2;ALIEN STRUCTURES?
3;ALIEN SHIPS?
if you do post them up next I await your evidence!

For what it is worth, if such an event happened (encountering either ET "astronauts" or possibly ET craft ... and remember the rumors from Apollo 11 where Armstrong is alleged to have said words to the effect of ... "They are on the rim of the crater, they are HUGE, they are watching us!) such events WOULD have been deleted prior to the public seeing it. Look at what Anaximander showed in the vids where it was obvious something was deleted. I think this speaks for itself.

Decker

 

[bbridges]

Please, who said it had anything to do with aliens or anything else for that matter. Not me. These videos interest some of us because it is more information about possible manipulation of what was offered at the time as live and unedited. What you choose to read into it or out of it is of course your prerogative, okay, Roseanne Rosannadanna?(if you're ancient enough like me, to remember 70's Saturday Night Live skits).

 

[softbeard]

Can't the qunidar tones just be tones? Must they imply some complicated conspiracy? I don't get it. You can probably associate any number of subtle pixel changes in the video just when the tones occur. Does this mean a complicated conspiracy is afoot?
As for odd behavior of astronauts; well maybe they behaved oddly for completely unrelated reasons, like maybe they were having personal problems at the time. Who knows. My point is that ascribing everything to some conspiracy usually doesn't lead you very far. If there's real proof of some coverup, fine, but there would have to be a helluva motive for something this complicated.

 

[Bob Watson]

For what it is worth, if such an event happened (encountering either ET "astronauts" or possibly ET craft ... and remember the rumors from Apollo 11 where Armstrong is alleged to have said words to the effect of ... "They are on the rim of the crater, they are HUGE, they are watching us!) such events WOULD have been deleted prior to the public seeing it. Look at what Anaximander showed in the vids where it was obvious something was deleted. I think this speaks for itself.










Decker

OK then if not ALIENS what is being deleted what is NASA hiding here?

 

[bbridges]

We don't know if they,'re hiding anything, vvf, a.) ...because they hid it(possibly), and b.)...because the evil alien overlords and their mind-controlled secret government cabal lackey's who killed Kennedy and wired building 7, and are poisoning us with their chemtrails are totally in control. There, have a field day.

---------- Post added at 01:52 PM ---------- Previous post was at 12:32 PM ----------

Agreed. Now what?

---------- Post added at 01:54 PM ---------- Previous post was at 01:52 PM ----------

My last post is a response to softbeard's last post.

 

[Decker]

We don't know if they,'re hiding anything, vvf, a.) ...because they hid it(possibly), and b.)...because the evil alien overlords and their mind-controlled secret government cabal lackey's who killed Kennedy and wired building 7, and are poisoning us with their chemtrails are totally in control. There, have a field day.

Me? I'm holding out for the "evil alien overlords and their secret govt. controlled lackeys." Sheesh, how could you go wrong with that mix?

Decker

 

[bbridges]

Really, it's so obvious

 

[Bob Watson]

I was hoping for Ikey's reptoids...

 

[bbridges]

Yeah, I've never been able to look at Queen Elizabeth quite the same since Ikey put that image in my head.