NEW! LOWEST RATES EVER -- SUPPORT THE SHOW AND ENJOY THE VERY BEST PREMIUM PARACAST EXPERIENCE! Welcome to The Paracast+, eight years young! For a low subscription fee, you can download the ad-free version of The Paracast and the exclusive, member-only, After The Paracast bonus podcast, featuring color commentary, exclusive interviews, the continuation of interviews that began on the main episode of The Paracast. We also offer lifetime memberships! Flash! Take advantage of our lowest rates ever! Act now! It's easier than ever to susbcribe! You can sign up right here!

Reply to thread

Message

I agree that in certain NDE cases it could indeed be that the Verifiable Details were misinterpreted from what actually occurred, embellished, Etc. However, I disagree with the Debunker stance that if it could have happened in some cases, then it must have happened in ALL cases.

Which is essentially what that guy interviewed on The Paracast on the Topic of UFOs seemed to be asserting, in a different context. "Some people have misidentified UFOs, therefore they ALL must have." "If it could have been misinterpreted / misidentified, it MUST have, in ALL documented cases."

I agree in certain cases it could be, but the blanket-suggestion they all must be I have problems with.

Now, I'm not saying that's what you're suggesting, but I've debated people before who essentially were making that assertion. So just saying.

<blockquote data-quote="Eteponge" data-source="post: 75953" data-attributes="member: 1275">I agree that in certain NDE cases it could indeed be that the Verifiable Details were misinterpreted from what actually occurred, embellished, Etc. However, I disagree with the Debunker stance that if it could have happened in some cases, then it must have happened in ALL cases.Which is essentially what that guy interviewed on The Paracast on the Topic of UFOs seemed to be asserting, in a different context. &quot;Some people have misidentified UFOs, therefore they ALL must have.&quot; &quot;If it could have been misinterpreted / misidentified, it MUST have, in ALL documented cases.&quot;I agree in certain cases it could be, but the blanket-suggestion they all must be I have problems with.Now, I&#039;m not saying that&#039;s what you&#039;re suggesting, but I&#039;ve debated people before who essentially were making that assertion. So just saying.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Eteponge, post: 75953, member: 1275"] I agree that in certain NDE cases it could indeed be that the Verifiable Details were misinterpreted from what actually occurred, embellished, Etc. However, I disagree with the Debunker stance that if it could have happened in some cases, then it must have happened in ALL cases. Which is essentially what that guy interviewed on The Paracast on the Topic of UFOs seemed to be asserting, in a different context. "Some people have misidentified UFOs, therefore they ALL must have." "If it could have been misinterpreted / misidentified, it MUST have, in ALL documented cases." I agree in certain cases it could be, but the blanket-suggestion they all must be I have problems with. Now, I'm not saying that's what you're suggesting, but I've debated people before who essentially were making that assertion. So just saying. [/QUOTE]

Verification