• NEW! LOWEST RATES EVER -- SUPPORT THE SHOW AND ENJOY THE VERY BEST PREMIUM PARACAST EXPERIENCE! Welcome to The Paracast+, eight years young! For a low subscription fee, you can download the ad-free version of The Paracast and the exclusive, member-only, After The Paracast bonus podcast, featuring color commentary, exclusive interviews, the continuation of interviews that began on the main episode of The Paracast. We also offer lifetime memberships! Flash! Take advantage of our lowest rates ever! Act now! It's easier than ever to susbcribe! You can sign up right here!

    Subscribe to The Paracast Newsletter!

New Ohare vid?

Forums New posts

Free episodes:

First I've seen it. It looks pretty good to me being that it's a cellphone camera looking towards the sun—which could be why it's so dark, right?

What doesn't add up is that this looks like a really sunny day, that day if I recall was cloudy, and this thing was just below the cloud layer.
 
I think it's total shit. If witnesses are not willing to come forward and identify themselves, then they're FOS. There's nothing compelling about this video. You can quote me.

dB
 
a flag goes up for me anytime i see a saucer shape. a square will fly thru space quite easily. then again, it is possible that an aerodynamic shape is needed to effectively fly in "their" home air space.
 
Oh well... It wouldn't be the first fraud perpetrated in the name of Ufology.

It would be so much easier if this sort of thing immediately caused cancer of the genitals.
 
  • From - HeraldTribune.com | Sarasota Florida | Southwest Florida's Information Leader
    Hoaxers are getting boring

    by Billy Cox
    Early this week, it appeared as if rumors of footage from the celebrated 11/7/06 UFO incident over Chicago’s O’Hare International Airport were about to be verified. Which would’ve been impressive, because this was the one that eyewitnesses claimed burned a round hole in the low cloud cover during its unhurried departure from the vicinity of the United Airlines terminal.

    Unfortunately, even before you clicked on the sequence at UFO Examiner: O'Hare UFO video surfaces on Youtube, this one started barking like a dog. The video, slugged "Chicago O'Hare Airport UFO Witness Breaks His Silence,” was an anonymous post with this introduction: "I have sat on this evidence for over 2 years, mainly because of the nature of my background, if you knew who I was then you would understand.”

    Hmm. Somebody extremely important, obviously. Barack Obama? Hot Rod Blogojevich?

    Anyway, just for the hell of it, because even a broken clock is right twice a day, De Void asked Ted Roe to take a look. Roe was a member of the National Aviation Reporting Center on Anomalous Phenomena team that published a media-ignored analysis of that event at http://www.narcap.org/reports/010/TR10_Case_18a.pdf.

    Roe was skeptical from the first glaring inconsistency in the account, which stated the object was “well over 100 meters in length.” Roe said in an e-mail that none of the confirmed eyewitnesses “described it as gigantic or even large.”

    There were numerous other problems, including the bluish sky on an overcast day, plus a lack of identifiable airport markers for context. Bottom line: “I don't see anything of technical value as there is no movement, no distortion or anything else of useful interest...I do think that this is a hoax and the person who is fronting it has dug himself a deep hole and will probably not come forward to defend it in public.”

    Why is it that people with too much time on their hands always hoax UFOs? Why not show a little imagination and recreate leprechauns or gryphons or maybe even the return of the quagga?
 
Without reading the other posts, I have to say that this video is highly suspect.

If this is a cell phone video, two things come to mind:

1) The object seems to be fairly well stabilized in the field of view. Very hard to do with a cellphone cam and an object at any distance.

2) The iris doesn't seem to vary at all. Even with "good" cellphone cameras the automatic iris isn't quite sure of how open/closed it should be, so there seems to be a large variance of light allowed. (I'm not at all familiar with proper terminology.)

I'm sure if I wanted to, I could come up with a dozen other reasons that this footage is fake.
 
I've seen more convincing FLASH Animation! (SIGH) I wish the folks who "crap out this garbage" would realize they're wasting time even making it.
The thing is this event happened and it's insulting that someone would try mucking investigations up.:mad:
 
Back
Top