• NEW! LOWEST RATES EVER -- SUPPORT THE SHOW AND ENJOY THE VERY BEST PREMIUM PARACAST EXPERIENCE! Welcome to The Paracast+, eight years young! For a low subscription fee, you can download the ad-free version of The Paracast and the exclusive, member-only, After The Paracast bonus podcast, featuring color commentary, exclusive interviews, the continuation of interviews that began on the main episode of The Paracast. We also offer lifetime memberships! Flash! Take advantage of our lowest rates ever! Act now! It's easier than ever to susbcribe! You can sign up right here!

    Subscribe to The Paracast Newsletter!

No accountability?

Free episodes:

The IRONY here is that without climate change (global warming and cooling) there would be NO Polar Bears. hmmmm.... think about it.
 
There should certainly be an eye kept on him. If he has some research in peer-reviewed scientific journals, that does go to his credit. And that is, among other things, something that would be nice for ufologist types to have.

That being said, polar bears are great as far as animals go, so I'm glad we have them.
 
And that is, among other things, something that would be nice for ufologist types to have.


That's the thing. I still don't consider "ufology" to be a science. Now, that's ok cause I'm not one of those folks that think every truth has to be validated by a test tube. But, since people like Stanton Friedman and Stephen Greer and others use the title Physicist and Doctor then it becomes fair to question their credibility. Still, I'm not knocking Friedman because I do think right or wrong he is sincere. Greer? Well, I didn't know much about him until I heard him on the Paracast. Not overly impressed. :-) Anyway, I digress. I just thought the above article was intersting. Especially in light of the recent controversy concerning creditentials and credibility. :-) I for instance am not a credible speller. :cool:

---------- Post added at 07:13 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:36 PM ----------

Another reason that "Peer Reviewed" journals suffer the same political fate as all of the things we mere mortals do. Arguments abound. :-)

http://news.yahoo.com/nasa-data-blow-gaping-hold-global-warming-alarmism-192334971.html
 
Polar bears are proof that climate change is normal and necessary for evolution to take place.
 
That's the thing. I still don't consider "ufology" to be a science

Don't get me wrong, I don't really put it in that category either. That being said, I would like to see the aspects that can be done that way, be done that way. There are some who approach it that way, but I just wish that more did.

Polar bears are proof that climate change is normal and necessary for evolution to take place

Well, I'm not entirely sure of that, but I do think polar bears are proof that polar bears are neat.
 
Back
Top