NEW! LOWEST RATES EVER -- SUPPORT THE SHOW AND ENJOY THE VERY BEST PREMIUM PARACAST EXPERIENCE! Welcome to The Paracast+, eight years young! For a low subscription fee, you can download the ad-free version of The Paracast and the exclusive, member-only, After The Paracast bonus podcast, featuring color commentary, exclusive interviews, the continuation of interviews that began on the main episode of The Paracast. We also offer lifetime memberships! Flash! Take advantage of our lowest rates ever! Act now! It's easier than ever to susbcribe! You can sign up right here!

Reply to thread

Message

Though without question there is another reality between our version of objective reality, what is in our heads and what else is out there. The frequencies of light and sound that are beyond our capacities do exist. Our sensory sytem is a limited virtual reality event in our mental plane - the lines appear to be blurry already. We still have limited understandings of where consciousness comes from. We speculate on whether or not plasma is conscious. We know a lot that we don't know a lot.

And UFO reality definitely appears to be something that is beyond our grasp to understand on many levels. In Clark's model of event and experience anomalies he has at least articulated a way of comprehending essential categories of the phenomenon. He is repeatedly diligent in his investigations of the phenomenon and is one of the few UFO writers that first made some sense to me.

I'm a fan; I confess. I don't think he goes far enough, but his paradigms based on the encyclopedic history of the phenomenon are still quite insightful. Vallée goes further, Keel is weirder, Bishop is more imaginative. But as Bishop identifies, as Clark, Keel and even Vallée does about the phenomenon, It Defies Language. The phenomenon is simply hard to talk about. So I can see how Clark gets frustrated in how hard a thing it is to know. And the big guns in the field and new strong voice remind us that we really don't know a lot at all about the phenomena.

It's weird. It's highly strange. It appears to be beyond us, and maybe we need to imagine another realm that it may come from, another reality that we can't fully participate in except in very rare moments.

<blockquote data-quote="Burnt State" data-source="post: 275924" data-attributes="member: 5332">Though without question there is another reality between our version of objective reality, what is in our heads and what else is out there. The frequencies of light and sound that are beyond our capacities do exist. Our sensory sytem is a limited virtual reality event in our mental plane - the lines appear to be blurry already. We still have limited understandings of where consciousness comes from. We speculate on whether or not plasma is conscious. We know a lot that we don&#039;t know a lot.And UFO reality definitely appears to be something that is beyond our grasp to understand on many levels. In Clark&#039;s model of event and experience anomalies he has at least articulated a way of comprehending essential categories of the phenomenon. He is repeatedly diligent in his investigations of the phenomenon and is one of the few UFO writers that first made some sense to me.&nbsp; I&#039;m a fan; I confess. I don&#039;t think he goes far enough, but his paradigms based on the encyclopedic history of the phenomenon are still quite insightful. Vallée goes further, Keel is weirder, Bishop is more imaginative. But as Bishop identifies, as Clark, Keel and even Vallée does about the phenomenon, It Defies Language. The phenomenon is simply hard to talk about. So I can see how Clark gets frustrated in how hard a thing it is to know. And the big guns in the field and new strong voice remind us that we really don&#039;t know a lot at all about the phenomena. It&#039;s weird. It&#039;s highly strange. It appears to be beyond us, and maybe we need to imagine another realm that it may come from, another reality that we can&#039;t fully participate in except in very rare moments.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Burnt State, post: 275924, member: 5332"] Though without question there is another reality between our version of objective reality, what is in our heads and what else is out there. The frequencies of light and sound that are beyond our capacities do exist. Our sensory sytem is a limited virtual reality event in our mental plane - the lines appear to be blurry already. We still have limited understandings of where consciousness comes from. We speculate on whether or not plasma is conscious. We know a lot that we don't know a lot. And UFO reality definitely appears to be something that is beyond our grasp to understand on many levels. In Clark's model of event and experience anomalies he has at least articulated a way of comprehending essential categories of the phenomenon. He is repeatedly diligent in his investigations of the phenomenon and is one of the few UFO writers that first made some sense to me. I'm a fan; I confess. I don't think he goes far enough, but his paradigms based on the encyclopedic history of the phenomenon are still quite insightful. Vallée goes further, Keel is weirder, Bishop is more imaginative. But as Bishop identifies, as Clark, Keel and even Vallée does about the phenomenon, It Defies Language. The phenomenon is simply hard to talk about. So I can see how Clark gets frustrated in how hard a thing it is to know. And the big guns in the field and new strong voice remind us that we really don't know a lot at all about the phenomena. It's weird. It's highly strange. It appears to be beyond us, and maybe we need to imagine another realm that it may come from, another reality that we can't fully participate in except in very rare moments. [/QUOTE]

Verification