• NEW! LOWEST RATES EVER -- SUPPORT THE SHOW AND ENJOY THE VERY BEST PREMIUM PARACAST EXPERIENCE! Welcome to The Paracast+, eight years young! For a low subscription fee, you can download the ad-free version of The Paracast and the exclusive, member-only, After The Paracast bonus podcast, featuring color commentary, exclusive interviews, the continuation of interviews that began on the main episode of The Paracast. We also offer lifetime memberships! Flash! Take advantage of our lowest rates ever! Act now! It's easier than ever to susbcribe! You can sign up right here!

    Subscribe to The Paracast Newsletter!

Oblivious, empathic or opportunist ?

What's the general attitude towards us ?

  • Oblivious

    Votes: 1 25.0%
  • Empathic

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Opportunistic

    Votes: 1 25.0%
  • All of the above

    Votes: 2 50.0%

  • Total voters
    4

Free episodes:

Ezechiel

Paranormal Adept
All the fish in this cosmic bowl have value.

maryufoclose.jpg

Expecting less than a full range of intents and attitudes towards human civilization makes no sense at all. If humans are really at the bottom of the cosmic sentient ladder, the only thing we can expect in terms of disclosure is a 'Nuremberg' type demonstation (1561) where we are observers of a battle between higher level entities fighting over territory that we think belongs to us ;)
http://www.ufoevidence.org/cases/case486.htm

ufo-history-008.jpg

When humans start operating at that level we'll finally meet the real managers ;)
 
Perhaps none of the above? As a 'Type 0' civilization moving towards 'Type 1' civilization within the next one hundred years, it may keen but detached interest. According to Michio Kaku, our current stage represents the most dangerous period in our evolution and the time when most civilizations are likely to go extinct or regress deeply back into 'Type 0' status -- we have the tools for our own destruction, suffering from overpopulation (?), but aren't necessarily smart enough to avoid doing ourselves in.

Part of this also depends on whether we buy into what Budd Hopkins and David Jacobs are saying. Given the number of sightings, is it logical to assume that these are mere scouting or monitoring missions (this is Dr. Vallee's point)?
 
Perhaps none of the above? As a 'Type 0' civilization moving towards 'Type 1' civilization within the next one hundred years, it may keen but detached interest. According to Michio Kaku, our current stage represents the most dangerous period in our evolution and the time when most civilizations are likely to go extinct or regress deeply back into 'Type 0' status -- we have the tools for our own destruction, suffering from overpopulation (?), but aren't necessarily smart enough to avoid doing ourselves in.

Part of this also depends on whether we buy into what Budd Hopkins and David Jacobs are saying. Given the number of sightings, is it logical to assume that these are mere scouting or monitoring missions (this is Dr. Vallee's point)?

I personally like Michio Kaku's evolutive approach. The next logical step is assessing the distribution of type 0/1/2/3 in our galactic area and the probabilities of contact. (Kepler telescope represents the beginning of that search).

Further down the road lie 'mere scouting or monitoring' activities that you mention and that Dr. Vallee subscribes to.

Further down the road would be actual contact when the capabilities of competing type 1 civilizations actually enables them to occupy the same time/space and begin exchange (or combat lol).

This is the kind of structured framework that makes sense to me. Very nuts and bolts

What is also cool about civilization levels is that you can build a grid and kind of understand potential intents structured as follows:


cosmic.jpg

;)
 
Back
Top