NEW! LOWEST RATES EVER -- SUPPORT THE SHOW AND ENJOY THE VERY BEST PREMIUM PARACAST EXPERIENCE! Welcome to The Paracast+, eight years young! For a low subscription fee, you can download the ad-free version of The Paracast and the exclusive, member-only, After The Paracast bonus podcast, featuring color commentary, exclusive interviews, the continuation of interviews that began on the main episode of The Paracast. We also offer lifetime memberships! Flash! Take advantage of our lowest rates ever! Act now! It's easier than ever to susbcribe! You can sign up right here!

Reply to thread

Message

Romanek has a pretrial motions hearing today. I believe that trial is scheduled for January, but I am not sure if that remains current. Both things are of interest to me so I hope to find out more about the hearing. The trial has been postponed numerous times - last March, the court found Romanek competent enough to proceed - but perhaps it will actually go forward in the near future.

http://www.larimer.org/da/CaseTrackingSummary.pdf

Interestingly enough, Brian Koopman (one of the detectives involved in the Romanek case) is facing unrelated charges and has a status conference on the 23 of this month. I don't think that Koopman's problems will affect the case against Romanek, other than I cannot imagine the prosecutor calling him as a witness.

<blockquote data-quote="Mulvaney" data-source="post: 237383" data-attributes="member: 6041">Romanek&nbsp; has a pretrial motions hearing today.&nbsp;&nbsp; I believe that trial is scheduled for January, but I am not sure if that remains current.&nbsp; Both things are of interest to me so I hope to find out more about the hearing.&nbsp; &nbsp; The trial has been postponed numerous times - last March, the court found Romanek competent enough to proceed - but perhaps it will actually go forward in the near future.<a href="http://www.larimer.org/da/CaseTrackingSummary.pdf" target="_blank">http://www.larimer.org/da/CaseTrackingSummary.pdf</a>Interestingly enough, Brian Koopman (one of the detectives involved in the Romanek case) is facing unrelated charges and has a status conference on the 23 of this month.&nbsp;&nbsp; I don&#039;t think that Koopman&#039;s problems will affect the case against Romanek, other than I cannot imagine the prosecutor calling him as a witness.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Mulvaney, post: 237383, member: 6041"] Romanek has a pretrial motions hearing today. I believe that trial is scheduled for January, but I am not sure if that remains current. Both things are of interest to me so I hope to find out more about the hearing. The trial has been postponed numerous times - last March, the court found Romanek competent enough to proceed - but perhaps it will actually go forward in the near future. [URL]http://www.larimer.org/da/CaseTrackingSummary.pdf[/URL] Interestingly enough, Brian Koopman (one of the detectives involved in the Romanek case) is facing unrelated charges and has a status conference on the 23 of this month. I don't think that Koopman's problems will affect the case against Romanek, other than I cannot imagine the prosecutor calling him as a witness. [/QUOTE]

Verification