Reverse Engineering for Fun and Profit
If you can believe some of the claims about the alleged technology behind UFOs, we retrieved wreckage from crashed spaceships over the years -- such as at Roswell, NM in 1947 -- and scientists are hard at work in secret to figure out what really makes them tick.
Indeed, the key claim made in the book "The Day After Roswell," from Philip Corso and Bill Birnes, is that some elements of advanced technology were covertly funneled into private industry. Thus, we were able to build such things as integrated circuits and night goggles.
Of course, if you believe any of this, how does that explain the well-known history behind these inventions, where you can trace the entire development process over the years? Doesn't that prove that the statements in that book are simply not true?
The other serious question here is whether we actually have the technology to tear apart an alien craft and understand not only how things operate, but how to develop our own version.
Consider, for example, what might happen if you took an iPhone and transported it back to, say, 100 years? Yes, I suppose that takes us back to my time travel discussion last week, but hear me out.
Assuming its tiny battery is fully charged, just what could that iPhone do? Well, there would be no cell phone network, so you couldn't place a call. You couldn't get online either, because there was no Internet. It'\s music and video player functions would operate, of course, as would the applications you've installed on this gadget, at least until the battery is spent. But how would you recharge it?.
All right, now the scientists of the early 20th century take apart the iPhone, but what would they do next? From its lithium ion battery to the sophisticated integrated circuits that access online networks and deliver pictures on the screen, where would they begin? Or would they just have to set this amazing device aside as some sort of anomaly whose total functionality is way beyond their understanding?
This doesn't mean that we would be totally ignorant of the internal workings of any alien contraption that came our way. One of our forum posters, for example, speculated that it's likely that integrated circuits might still be used for simple functions on a spaceship, even though alien technology had progressed way beyond them. After all, we still have mops and brooms in use despite our advanced early 21st century lifestyles.
Of course, reverse engineering would work best with artifacts that represent technology that we had already developed ourselves to some degree. Maybe our engineers and scientists had reached a sticking point, and the evidence of the finished product provided the clues they needed to take them to the finish line.
Now when the scientific papers describing that invention are published, they aren't going to admit they got a little help from an alien artifact. No way. Instead, they would simply adjust their accounts of the development process to fill in the blanks using conventional methods. That sort of spin control would be part and parcel of the agreement to gain access to this advanced technology. How could it be otherwise?
Unless a whistle blower came forward to tell the truth, we'd simply never know what really happened. Then again, maybe Bill Birnes is right that these secrets are being hidden in plain sight, with just enough disinformation to disguise the facts.
So if our scientists are truly at work discerning the secrets contained in the wreckage of a flying saucer, just what sort of inventions might we come up with next? Is that what they're actually doing over at Area 51 -- or is it all just a silly fantasy?
Peace,
Gene Steinberg
.....................................................................................
Gene and David:
I hope you don't mind if I copy your Newsletter pieces, here. But I have enjoyed reading them and they bring so many interesting questions to bat back and forth here at the Forum, imho!
LOVE the analogies you bring up such as an IPhone or a Laptop being given to our sceintists over 100 yrs ago and how they wouldn't be able to figure it out....
Bixyboo
If you can believe some of the claims about the alleged technology behind UFOs, we retrieved wreckage from crashed spaceships over the years -- such as at Roswell, NM in 1947 -- and scientists are hard at work in secret to figure out what really makes them tick.
Indeed, the key claim made in the book "The Day After Roswell," from Philip Corso and Bill Birnes, is that some elements of advanced technology were covertly funneled into private industry. Thus, we were able to build such things as integrated circuits and night goggles.
Of course, if you believe any of this, how does that explain the well-known history behind these inventions, where you can trace the entire development process over the years? Doesn't that prove that the statements in that book are simply not true?
The other serious question here is whether we actually have the technology to tear apart an alien craft and understand not only how things operate, but how to develop our own version.
Consider, for example, what might happen if you took an iPhone and transported it back to, say, 100 years? Yes, I suppose that takes us back to my time travel discussion last week, but hear me out.
Assuming its tiny battery is fully charged, just what could that iPhone do? Well, there would be no cell phone network, so you couldn't place a call. You couldn't get online either, because there was no Internet. It'\s music and video player functions would operate, of course, as would the applications you've installed on this gadget, at least until the battery is spent. But how would you recharge it?.
All right, now the scientists of the early 20th century take apart the iPhone, but what would they do next? From its lithium ion battery to the sophisticated integrated circuits that access online networks and deliver pictures on the screen, where would they begin? Or would they just have to set this amazing device aside as some sort of anomaly whose total functionality is way beyond their understanding?
This doesn't mean that we would be totally ignorant of the internal workings of any alien contraption that came our way. One of our forum posters, for example, speculated that it's likely that integrated circuits might still be used for simple functions on a spaceship, even though alien technology had progressed way beyond them. After all, we still have mops and brooms in use despite our advanced early 21st century lifestyles.
Of course, reverse engineering would work best with artifacts that represent technology that we had already developed ourselves to some degree. Maybe our engineers and scientists had reached a sticking point, and the evidence of the finished product provided the clues they needed to take them to the finish line.
Now when the scientific papers describing that invention are published, they aren't going to admit they got a little help from an alien artifact. No way. Instead, they would simply adjust their accounts of the development process to fill in the blanks using conventional methods. That sort of spin control would be part and parcel of the agreement to gain access to this advanced technology. How could it be otherwise?
Unless a whistle blower came forward to tell the truth, we'd simply never know what really happened. Then again, maybe Bill Birnes is right that these secrets are being hidden in plain sight, with just enough disinformation to disguise the facts.
So if our scientists are truly at work discerning the secrets contained in the wreckage of a flying saucer, just what sort of inventions might we come up with next? Is that what they're actually doing over at Area 51 -- or is it all just a silly fantasy?
Peace,
Gene Steinberg
.....................................................................................
Gene and David:
I hope you don't mind if I copy your Newsletter pieces, here. But I have enjoyed reading them and they bring so many interesting questions to bat back and forth here at the Forum, imho!
LOVE the analogies you bring up such as an IPhone or a Laptop being given to our sceintists over 100 yrs ago and how they wouldn't be able to figure it out....
Bixyboo