NEW! LOWEST RATES EVER -- SUPPORT THE SHOW AND ENJOY THE VERY BEST PREMIUM PARACAST EXPERIENCE! Welcome to The Paracast+, eight years young! For a low subscription fee, you can download the ad-free version of The Paracast and the exclusive, member-only, After The Paracast bonus podcast, featuring color commentary, exclusive interviews, the continuation of interviews that began on the main episode of The Paracast. We also offer lifetime memberships! Flash! Take advantage of our lowest rates ever! Act now! It's easier than ever to susbcribe! You can sign up right here!

Reply to thread

Message

Well, that was seriously disappointing. A brief clip of a tiny blob, apparently traveling in a straight line at more or less constant speed. And the only context is "East Coast in 2015", like the Gimbal, according to unconfirmed reports.

I believe Semivan had said in some interview that they had learnt from their mistakes and were at least doing some video analysis this time before the release, or something like that. Was that their best? Couldn't they even guesstimate the speed and size of that thing?

Furthermore, why was that published in the opinions section of Washington Post? Surely this can't be the "game-changer #2" that NYT was supposed to publish according to Leslie Kean? Either that fell apart, or the NYT has something else in the works, hopefully much better.

It's telling that Mellon just mentioned this new clip in one sentence, and wrote a whole lot more about the Nimitz incident again.

<blockquote data-quote="Realm" data-source="post: 270280" data-attributes="member: 9250">Well, that was seriously disappointing. A brief clip of a tiny blob, apparently traveling in a straight line at more or less constant speed. And the only context is &quot;East Coast in 2015&quot;, like the Gimbal, according to unconfirmed reports.I believe Semivan had said in some interview that they had learnt from their mistakes and were at least doing some video analysis this time before the release, or something like that. Was that their best? Couldn&#039;t they even guesstimate the speed and size of that thing?Furthermore, why was that published in the opinions section of Washington Post? Surely this can&#039;t be the &quot;game-changer #2&quot; that NYT was supposed to publish according to Leslie Kean? Either that fell apart, or the NYT has something else in the works, hopefully much better.It&#039;s telling that Mellon just mentioned this new clip in one sentence, and wrote a whole lot more about the Nimitz incident again.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Realm, post: 270280, member: 9250"] Well, that was seriously disappointing. A brief clip of a tiny blob, apparently traveling in a straight line at more or less constant speed. And the only context is "East Coast in 2015", like the Gimbal, according to unconfirmed reports. I believe Semivan had said in some interview that they had learnt from their mistakes and were at least doing some video analysis this time before the release, or something like that. Was that their best? Couldn't they even guesstimate the speed and size of that thing? Furthermore, why was that published in the opinions section of Washington Post? Surely this can't be the "game-changer #2" that NYT was supposed to publish according to Leslie Kean? Either that fell apart, or the NYT has something else in the works, hopefully much better. It's telling that Mellon just mentioned this new clip in one sentence, and wrote a whole lot more about the Nimitz incident again. [/QUOTE]

Verification