• NEW! LOWEST RATES EVER -- SUPPORT THE SHOW AND ENJOY THE VERY BEST PREMIUM PARACAST EXPERIENCE! Welcome to The Paracast+, eight years young! For a low subscription fee, you can download the ad-free version of The Paracast and the exclusive, member-only, After The Paracast bonus podcast, featuring color commentary, exclusive interviews, the continuation of interviews that began on the main episode of The Paracast. We also offer lifetime memberships! Flash! Take advantage of our lowest rates ever! Act now! It's easier than ever to susbcribe! You can sign up right here!

    Subscribe to The Paracast Newsletter!

Reply to thread

L'Problem is that there are so many people with are very differently informed and with huge difference in knowledge.


Lets say I read at least 5 books with engineering data about UFOs and probably about 15 papers written by engineers or scientist. Beside that I went through about 100-150 UFO cases where I can clearly see standard engineering patterns in UFO behavior.


And there are members in this forum who are conversant in Maxwell's and Einstein's equations. And that is absolute necessary to even start understanding UFOs.


Now how do you communicate about physicality of UFOs to a member of general public, who just refuses to learn anything that is too 'technical' and wants everything reduced to 'common sense'? 'Common sense' can help you prepare some eggs and bacon for breakfast, but will be completely useless in explaining any of modern science.


If we somehow can all be brought to the same level of information and knowledge, than we would be much more constructive as a group, instead constantly being territorial and trying to impose 'common sense' on each other. Its pointless even trying to resolve a 'non common sense' problem, like UFOs, with a 'common sense' (which, by the way, doesn't even exist).


Back
Top