NEW! LOWEST RATES EVER -- SUPPORT THE SHOW AND ENJOY THE VERY BEST PREMIUM PARACAST EXPERIENCE! Welcome to The Paracast+, eight years young! For a low subscription fee, you can download the ad-free version of The Paracast and the exclusive, member-only, After The Paracast bonus podcast, featuring color commentary, exclusive interviews, the continuation of interviews that began on the main episode of The Paracast. We also offer lifetime memberships! Flash! Take advantage of our lowest rates ever! Act now! It's easier than ever to susbcribe! You can sign up right here!

Reply to thread

Message

But "most sensible" doesn't make your results any less bogus than Maccabee's. They're not even scientifically sensible. Why not pick initial wind values and a turning radius that makes the object faster than any bird? Because that result can clearly be reached with assumptions that are equally arbitrary to the ones you decided on.

[QUOTE="MrBeliever, post: 270926, member: 9317"] But "most sensible" doesn't make your results any less bogus than Maccabee's. They're not even scientifically sensible. Why not pick initial wind values and a turning radius that makes the object faster than any bird? Because that result can clearly be reached with assumptions that are equally arbitrary to the ones you decided on. [/QUOTE]

Verification