• NEW! LOWEST RATES EVER -- SUPPORT THE SHOW AND ENJOY THE VERY BEST PREMIUM PARACAST EXPERIENCE! Welcome to The Paracast+, eight years young! For a low subscription fee, you can download the ad-free version of The Paracast and the exclusive, member-only, After The Paracast bonus podcast, featuring color commentary, exclusive interviews, the continuation of interviews that began on the main episode of The Paracast. We also offer lifetime memberships! Flash! Take advantage of our lowest rates ever! Act now! It's easier than ever to susbcribe! You can sign up right here!

    Subscribe to The Paracast Newsletter!

Popular Science's Effort at Debunking Stevenville

Forums New posts

Free episodes:

No way Im reading that. Its clearly a bunch of hardcore debunkers in skeptic clothing.

Can you cut to the chase? What was their big revelation?
 
It's not that bad of an article and it doesn't focus exclusively on McGaha. Whats his beef though?? He says the "radar" was caused by temperature inversions (of course) or ground clutter. And the article states that this rarely happens due to advances in radar technology. And inversions only happen in extreme situations. Then Mr McGaha goes on to say Phoenix, Stephenville, were military or flares. Which is it James?? Flares, planes, inversions, or lies??

The striking thing to me in the article is that they definitively said the Battle of Los Angeles was a ballon with a red flare. Ummmm, what?? OK, then where is this balloon that we must have hit judging by the amount of ammo we threw up in the air?? Where is it??

And of course Phoenix was just flares. Of course we all know that right??
 
Back
Top