• NEW! LOWEST RATES EVER -- SUPPORT THE SHOW AND ENJOY THE VERY BEST PREMIUM PARACAST EXPERIENCE! Welcome to The Paracast+, eight years young! For a low subscription fee, you can download the ad-free version of The Paracast and the exclusive, member-only, After The Paracast bonus podcast, featuring color commentary, exclusive interviews, the continuation of interviews that began on the main episode of The Paracast. We also offer lifetime memberships! Flash! Take advantage of our lowest rates ever! Act now! It's easier than ever to susbcribe! You can sign up right here!

    Subscribe to The Paracast Newsletter!

Questions for Nick Redfern!

Forums New posts

Free episodes:

Gene Steinberg

Gene Steinberg

Forum Super Hero
Staff member
So we have our friendly co-host Nick Redfern scheduled next week — Chris O'Brien will be my co-host for this episode — and we'll talk about the new book "The NASA Conspiracies: The Truth Behind the Moon Landings, Censored Photos, and the Face on Mars."

This book will cover many of the most popular theories in Nick's inimitable fashion. Please feel free to post your questions.
 
Hi Gene & Chris,

Q.1 Is there a real secret space program? or just a Cold War relic of propaganda?

Q.2 What is the historical make up of NASA regarding groups which formed the institution?

Q.3 Who ran early formation of NASA from 1947-53 and what was the board makeup ( OSS?MI(8, 9/10? )

Peace Space brothers,:)
BF
 
Hi everybody.

My Question for Nick:

It seems that over the years NASA's scope has greatly diminished. For those of us who have grown up with the idea that one of the greatest achievements of humankind has been manned space exploration, the agency's acronym might as well stand for Not As Satisfying Anymore. It seems as if the agency's greatest achievements have all been from last century.

With that in mind, do you see NASA as being the powerful clandestine organization that it once was, or has it perhaps become so powerfully clandestine that it's actually doing all sorts of amazing things while giving us the impression that it is practically as useful as a boar's teat?
 
How does it feel to be on a roll? Between this book and the last one, it seems like his work is generating some serious discussion and good vibes. It's a far cry from the reaction to 'Bodysnatchers.' Does he feel these books may become more of a legacy than the cryptozoology ones? Does he feel they are more 'important' or do they all have equal merit?

Do some of the earlier criticisms still sting or are they just part of the ufology/paranormal scene whereby you duck and weave and roll with the punches?
 
Back
Top