NEW! LOWEST RATES EVER -- SUPPORT THE SHOW AND ENJOY THE VERY BEST PREMIUM PARACAST EXPERIENCE! Welcome to The Paracast+, eight years young! For a low subscription fee, you can download the ad-free version of The Paracast and the exclusive, member-only, After The Paracast bonus podcast, featuring color commentary, exclusive interviews, the continuation of interviews that began on the main episode of The Paracast. We also offer lifetime memberships! Flash! Take advantage of our lowest rates ever! Act now! It's easier than ever to susbcribe! You can sign up right here!

Reply to thread

Message

If my understanding of the process is correct, I think you've already given him too much information. And static targets are suppopsedly more difficult. My thinking was more along the lines of sharing target information between some number of forum members, then tell Daz to let 'er rip. All members of the group then rate the performance 0 to 100%. Repeat the test to refine the scores.

Or something along those lines anyway. Maybe it's unfeasible. There is a certain amount of trust involved with exchanging target information over email.

Edit: I wrote this all before reading the rest of the replies. Now I'm morer redundanter.

[QUOTE="SnakeOil, post: 59693, member: 414"] If my understanding of the process is correct, I think you've already given him too much information. And static targets are suppopsedly more difficult. My thinking was more along the lines of sharing target information between some number of forum members, then tell Daz to let 'er rip. All members of the group then rate the performance 0 to 100%. Repeat the test to refine the scores. Or something along those lines anyway. Maybe it's unfeasible. There is a certain amount of trust involved with exchanging target information over email. Edit: I wrote this all before reading the rest of the replies. Now I'm morer redundanter. [/QUOTE]

Verification