• NEW! LOWEST RATES EVER -- SUPPORT THE SHOW AND ENJOY THE VERY BEST PREMIUM PARACAST EXPERIENCE! Welcome to The Paracast+, eight years young! For a low subscription fee, you can download the ad-free version of The Paracast and the exclusive, member-only, After The Paracast bonus podcast, featuring color commentary, exclusive interviews, the continuation of interviews that began on the main episode of The Paracast. We also offer lifetime memberships! Flash! Take advantage of our lowest rates ever! Act now! It's easier than ever to susbcribe! You can sign up right here!

    Subscribe to The Paracast Newsletter!

Scientists "Life On Mars 99% Confirmed by Viking"

Forums New posts

Free episodes:

Skymon876

Skymon876

Paranormal Adept
New analysis of 36-year-old data, resuscitated from printouts, shows that NASA found life on Mars, an international team of mathematicians and scientists conclude in a paper published this week.
Further, NASA doesn't need a human expedition to Mars to nail down the claim, neuropharmacologist and biologist Joseph Miller, with the UniversityofSouthernCalifornia's Keck School of Medicine, told Discovery News.
"The ultimate proof is to take a video of a Martian bacteria. They should send a microscope — watch the bacteria move," Miller said.


Mars Viking Robots 'Found Life' : Discovery News

The question is does anybody care. It is now 99% confirmed that a form of E.T. life (microbial organisms) exsists outside of planet earth. Isn't that the definition of alien life.

So were is the worldwide media?

Does anyone on this forum find this interesting?
 
So why hasn't some refined version of this experiment been performed by subsequent probes?
Payload restrictions? Technological limitations ? PR concerns? ???

Thirty six years of technological progress should count for something!
 
boomerang said:
So why hasn't some refined version of this experiment been performed by subsequent probes?
Payload restrictions? Technological limitations ? PR concerns? ???

Thirty six years of technological progress should count for something!
Click to expand...
I think they want to first identify places that bacteria of other microscopic life is most likely to be before they spend the money and resources launching something to Mars and have it return precisely nothing. That would be a sure way to get your funding chopped. The current way will produce new and positively perceived data every couple of months thereby justifying the budget. Its all about money!
 
If I'm not totally mistaken, back then, the scientists even said that they had found what they thought was evidence for life on mars: high amounts of carbon dioxide or methane or something. But later it was concluded that these amounts could also be explained by chemical processes that didn't necessarily include a life form. Occam's razor again. But no one can that they just ignored or withheld the data, I guess.
 
Back
Top