NEW! LOWEST RATES EVER -- SUPPORT THE SHOW AND ENJOY THE VERY BEST PREMIUM PARACAST EXPERIENCE! Welcome to The Paracast+, eight years young! For a low subscription fee, you can download the ad-free version of The Paracast and the exclusive, member-only, After The Paracast bonus podcast, featuring color commentary, exclusive interviews, the continuation of interviews that began on the main episode of The Paracast. We also offer lifetime memberships! Flash! Take advantage of our lowest rates ever! Act now! It's easier than ever to susbcribe! You can sign up right here!

Reply to thread

Message

Hey, Stonehart. I thought my post was very appropriate and very well worded. I'm sorry you had such a reaction to it. Do you have any legitimate or reasonable questions or thoughts concerning what it expressed? It was very on topic and addressed the very topic on which you began this thread.

My post addressed some very legitimate points, and I even waited to post to your thread to see what time would tell about the original "incident." Turns out it became quite blown out of proportion, to put it mildly.

Let me know if there are any questions you have about the post, or the "event" itself. I, as I said, made phone calls to try to get to the bottom of this "event" that now has become absurd. Just pointing that out. Thanks for your insight. I thought I was contributing facts to the "incident." Kim

<blockquote data-quote="Kim323" data-source="post: 134750" data-attributes="member: 162">Hey, Stonehart.&nbsp; I thought my post was very appropriate and very well worded.&nbsp; I&#039;m sorry you had such a reaction to it.&nbsp; Do you have any legitimate or reasonable questions or thoughts concerning what it expressed?&nbsp; It was very on topic and addressed the very topic on which you began this thread.&nbsp; &nbsp;My post addressed some very legitimate points, and I even waited to post to your thread to see what time would tell about the original &quot;incident.&quot;&nbsp; Turns out it became quite blown out of proportion, to put it mildly.&nbsp;Let me know if there are any questions you have about the post, or the &quot;event&quot; itself.&nbsp; I, as I said, made phone calls to try to get to the bottom of this &quot;event&quot; that now has become absurd.&nbsp; Just pointing that out.&nbsp; Thanks for your insight.&nbsp; I thought I was contributing facts to the &quot;incident.&quot;&nbsp; Kim<img src="/forum/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/wink.png"&nbsp; class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=";)" title="Wink&nbsp; &nbsp; ;)" data-shortname=";)" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="Kim323, post: 134750, member: 162"] Hey, Stonehart. I thought my post was very appropriate and very well worded. I'm sorry you had such a reaction to it. Do you have any legitimate or reasonable questions or thoughts concerning what it expressed? It was very on topic and addressed the very topic on which you began this thread. My post addressed some very legitimate points, and I even waited to post to your thread to see what time would tell about the original "incident." Turns out it became quite blown out of proportion, to put it mildly. Let me know if there are any questions you have about the post, or the "event" itself. I, as I said, made phone calls to try to get to the bottom of this "event" that now has become absurd. Just pointing that out. Thanks for your insight. I thought I was contributing facts to the "incident." Kim;) [/QUOTE]

Verification