• NEW! LOWEST RATES EVER -- SUPPORT THE SHOW AND ENJOY THE VERY BEST PREMIUM PARACAST EXPERIENCE! Welcome to The Paracast+, eight years young! For a low subscription fee, you can download the ad-free version of The Paracast and the exclusive, member-only, After The Paracast bonus podcast, featuring color commentary, exclusive interviews, the continuation of interviews that began on the main episode of The Paracast. We also offer lifetime memberships! Flash! Take advantage of our lowest rates ever! Act now! It's easier than ever to susbcribe! You can sign up right here!

    Subscribe to The Paracast Newsletter!

Space-Time Vortex discovered

  • Thread starter Thread starter pixelsmith
  • Start date Start date

Free episodes:

Probably why I didn't pursue physics; but does the dimple (fat guy on the trampoline) only work in two directions? In other words; whenever this effect is shown in diagram-form it's like the south pole is sitting on the trampoline -- as if the south pole is the butt end (sorry Australia). I would assume the north pole is exactly same. What about the the central axis though -- it's hard to see a dimple if the dimple is everywhere; isn't it? I'm obviously going to need some help on this one.
 
Rotational frame-dragging (the Lense–Thirring effect) appears in the general principle of relativity and similar theories in the vicinity of rotating massive objects. Under the Lense–Thirring effect, the frame of reference in which a clock ticks the fastest is one which is rotating around the object as viewed by a distant observer. This also means that light traveling in the direction of rotation of the object will move around the object faster than light moving against the rotation as seen by a distant observer. It is now the best-known effect, partly thanks to the Gravity Probe B experiment. Qualitatively, frame-dragging can be viewed as the gravitational analog of electromagnetic induction. Also an inner region is dragged more than an outer region. This produces interesting locally rotating frames. For example, imagine that an "ice skater", in orbit over the equator and rotationally at rest with respect to the stars, extends her arms. The arm extended toward the black hole will be torqued spinward. The arm extended away from the black hole will be torqued anti-spinward. She will therefore be rotationally sped up, in a counter-rotating sense to the black hole. This is the opposite of what happens in everyday experience. If she is already rotating at some speed when she extends her arms, inertial effects and frame-dragging effects will balance and her spin will not change. Due to the Principle of Equivalence gravitational effects are locally indistinguishable from inertial effects, so the rotation rate at which, when she extends her arms, nothing happens is her local reference for non-rotation. This frame is rotating with respect to the fixed stars and counter-rotating with respect to the black hole. A useful metaphor is a planetary gear system with the black hole being the sun gear, the ice skater being a planetary gear and the outside universe being the ring gear. See Mach's principle.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thirring_effect

The phenomenon observed by American and Italian astronomers is known as frame-dragging or Lense-Thirring precession.
As a consequence of Albert Einstein’s theories, physicists predicted in 1918 that the gravity of any spinning body should distort space and time in its surroundings, much like a twister picks up objects in their path.
The jump to hyperspace
On one hand, the new evidence represents merely one more step toward proving a long-accepted theory about the way the universe works. But on the other hand, space-time warps lead many people to think more seriously about warp drives, wormholes and other “Star Trek” devices for breaking the cosmic speed limit of 186,000 miles per second, the speed of light.
According to “Star Trek” lore, warp drives can propel a starship at faster-than-light speeds by moving a wrinkle of space-time containing the ship. Wormholes are supposedly tunnels in space-time that allow travelers to take an inter-dimensional express route between two distant locations.

And thats the BIG thing about frame dragging, Its been theorised that while the speed of light is the limit in spacetime, we may be able to "drag" a frame of space-time at speeds faster than light, within this frame or bubble of spacetime the usual laws are not broken, its a work around to the limits

For Millis, the new findings about frame-dragging illustrate that “space-time itself is this beastie that’s more complex” than most people think.
Eventually, he said, spacecraft designers may be able to design a propulsion system that takes advantage of new cosmological principles.

the GPB experiment proved that the earth "drags" space-time as it spins

An international team of NASA and university researchers has found the first direct evidence the Earth is dragging space and time around itself as it rotates.
“General relativity predicts massive rotating objects should drag space-time around themselves as they rotate,” Pavlis said. “Frame dragging is like what happens if a bowling ball spins in a thick fluid such as molasses. As the ball spins, it pulls the molasses around itself. Anything stuck in the molasses will also move around the ball. Similarly, as the Earth rotates, it pulls space-time in its vicinity around itself. This will shift the orbits of satellites near Earth.” The study is a follow-up to earlier work in 1998 where the authors’ team reported the first direct detection of the effect.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3077887

So we now know that frame dragging occurs in nature, Exploiting this as a means of faster than light propulsion is a long way away, but we know its theoretically possible now.
 
I so wish I could dig into not yet published news by NASA and ESA. Thanks to the internet we at least get a tiny glimpse of it. I haven't heard of 'YU55' since today, f.e.

Hope I purchased a Telescope by then.
 
Its harrp!

Why would you say that ?

The gravity probe B experiment seems like a totally different application of technology than HAARP (if thats what you refer to), not quite sure what HARRP is though. Perhaps you could explain what HARRP is and how its related to the gravity probe B experiment which proves frame dragging

The Gravity Probe B experiment comprises four London moment gyroscopes and a reference telescope sighted on HR8703 (also known as IM Pegasi), a binary star in the constellation Pegasus. In polar orbit, with the gyro spin directions also pointing toward HR8703, the frame-dragging and geodetic effects came out at right angles, each gyroscope measuring both.
The gyroscopes are housed in a dewar of superfluid helium, maintaining a temperature of under 2 kelvins (−271 °C, −456 °F). Near-absolute zero temperatures are required in order to minimize molecular interference, and enable the lead and niobium components of the gyroscope mechanisms to become superconductive.
At the time, the gyroscopes were the most nearly spherical objects ever made. Approximately the size of ping pong balls, they are perfectly round to within forty atoms (less than 10 nm). If one of these spheres were scaled to the size of the earth, the tallest mountains and deepest ocean trench would measure only 2.4 m (8 ft) high.<SUP id=cite_ref-21 class=reference>[22]</SUP> They are composed of fused quartz and coated with an extremely thin layer of niobium. A primary concern is minimizing any influence on their spin, so the gyroscopes must never touch their containing compartment. They are held suspended with electric fields, spun up using a flow of helium gas, and their spin axes are sensed by monitoring the magnetic field of the superconductive niobium layer with SQUIDs. (A spinning superconductor generates a magnetic field precisely aligned with the rotation axis – see London moment.)
 
Albert Einstein was right, say scientists, 100 years on

The theory of general relativity is as relevant to us today as it was when it was formulated, as a discovery about space-time reveals

View a pdf graphic showing the Gravity Probe B project


Gravity-B-probe-006.jpg
Gravity B probe. Photograph: Guardian

After working for half a century and spending £500m, scientists last week revealed that they have detected strange fluctuations in Earth's orbit. Space-time is bent and then twisted round our planet as it rotates, announced researchers with Nasa's Gravity Probe B project.
The effect is tiny but crucial, they added – and was predicted almost 100 years ago by Albert Einstein in his great theory of gravity, general relativity. According to Einstein, an apple falls to the ground not because it feels the force of Earth's gravity but because the apple is responding to the curvature of space-time near the Earth's surface caused by the planet's huge mass. In the same way, the Sun bends space in a manner that allows Earth to revolve around it.
Crucially, the theory raised a host of other predictions that scientists have been confirming for the past century. The findings of Gravity Probe B are the latest in a long list of these many vindications of Einstein's genius and reveal how his great theory touches our lives in unexpected ways.
"We have completed this landmark experiment of testing Einstein's universe," said project leader Francis Everitt, of Stanford University. "And Einstein survives."
Everitt began work on Gravity Probe B in 1962 and has worked on nothing else since, although he had many close shaves, with the satellite being cancelled and then revived on seven occasions before it was eventually launched in 2004. Then, after the probe reached orbit, spurious electrical signals were found to be distorting data that it had sent back. It took five years' study before scientists found how to extract clean data from it.
Results of the analyses of this data were revealed last week. They showed that Earth does indeed bend space-time. It was also found that, as our planet rotates, it drags space-time with it – a phenomenon known as frame-dragging. The effect is like spinning a spoon in a cup of tea, causing the liquid to start swirling round inside the cup.
These phenomena are tiny, it should be noted. In the case of frame-dragging, space around Earth turns at a rate of 37 one-thousandths of a second every year because our planet pulls it round as it revolves – a rate predicted by Einstein.
"The probe's results are a great achievement, but we should not think of them as a new proof that general relativity is right," said Graham Farmelo, physicist and author. "Einstein was shown to be correct long ago, only a few years after he came up with the theory. However, we are still testing out all its predictions. The results from Gravity Probe B are just the most recent, successful outcomes."
In fact, the premise of Einstein's theory of general relativity was proved within three years of its publication in 1916. British astronomer Arthur Eddington was involved in an expedition to Príncipe island in west Africa, where he photographed the total solar eclipse of 1919. The photographs showed that the positions of stars whose light rays passed near the Sun appeared to have been slightly shifted because their light had been curved by the Sun's huge gravitational field. This was noticeable only during an eclipse because the Sun's brightness would otherwise obscure the affected stars.
"Eddington presented these as a triumph for general relativity, and Einstein, who was known to physicists but not the public, became a star overnight," said Farmelo.
For his part, Einstein never had any doubts that he was right. When asked how he would have reacted if Eddington's observations had disproved his theory, he replied: "I would have felt sorry for the dear Lord. The theory is correct."
Since then, scientists have produced many other confirmations. One example was provided by US astronomers Russell Hulse and John Taylor, who discovered two dense collapsed stars, known as neutron stars, that were in orbit around each other and that were losing energy that could only be explained through the gravitational radiation, another phenomenon predicted by Einstein. In 1993 Hulse and Taylor were awarded that year's Nobel prize for physics.
"General relativity touches our lives in many unexpected ways," added physicist Dr Charles Wang, of Aberdeen University. "Another effect that is predicted by general relativity is the phenomenon known as gravitational time dilation. This states that time slows down as gravitational strength increases, a fact that has been confirmed by GPS satellites. These carry atomic clocks that have to run at a different speed to those on the ground because gravity is greater there. If you didn't, the world's GPS system would break down."
"Einstein's theory of general relativity is one of the most beautiful pieces of scientific work in history," added Farmelo. "But it is not the whole story. It explains how massive objects affect space and time, but it tells us little about how very small sub-atomic particles behave."
This point was acknowledged by Wang. "We still have to test how gravity behaves at a sub-atomic, quantum level," he said. "We hope to do that with a project called the Space-Time Explorer Quest, which the European Space Agency is now studying."
Together with Wang's group, scientists at Birmingham, the Rutherford-Appleton Laboratory and the National Physical Laboratory, along with German researchers, have proposed building a probe that would use caesium or rubidium atoms, cooled close to absolute zero, to test the effect of gravity at the sub-atomic level and, they hope, provide data that could reconcile relativity and quantum theory.
"That won't be for another 10 years or more," said Wang. "That means we are going to have a lot of work to do on general relativity for quite some time."
 
Back
Top