Wade
FeralNormal master
Don't know if this would be a conspiracy even if it is true but here is a paper from a man ( Miles Mathis) who claims that Stephen Hawking died some time ago and was replaced
"...I have written several papers critiquing Stephen Hawking, including a long one on his Brave NewWorld series for the BBC. But this is my first paper really linking my science research with my faked events research. I will use simple photo analysis and facial analysis to quickly show you the current Stephen Hawking is not the same person as the original Stephen Hawking.
This should not surprise you too much, especially if you know something about ALS. ALS is
Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, also known as Lou Gehrig's Disease. We are told Hawking has had ALS for over 52 years, which is a record by many decades. Jason Becker is the only person I have heard of who has lived more than 20 years with the disease, so there is about a three-decade difference between the longest survivor and the second longest survivor. That is a more than 100% differencebetween first and second place. It would be like Justin Gatlin running the 100 meters in 9.8 seconds,and Usain Bolt beating him with a time of 4.5 seconds. In other words, statistically it doesn't happen.
The average survival time for ALS is four years. When Hawking was first diagnosed in 1963, doctors gave him two years to live. And yet here we are, 52 years later and counting. Should you believe it? Well, no. Like Becker, it appears the real Hawking did beat the odds and live for about 20 years. But at some point he was replaced. I have no proof he died, but I assume that is why they replaced him.
He was a very useful public relations entity for physics, and they didn't want to lose him.
But rather than speculate on that, let us go right to the evidence. I won't call it proof, since of courseyou are free to disagree with me. This is an opinion piece, not a court transcript; and even if it were a stamped court finding, you would be free to disagree with it. You don't have to agree with anything anyone tells you, ever. Remember that. This paper is nothing more than presented evidence, evidence I find compelling. If you also find it compelling, fine. If you don't, also fine..."
"...Which means Hawking might not have written A Brief History of Time, which
came out in 1988. I haven't pinpointed the date, but that was about the time they made the switch. Mycurrent guess is early 80's, which—if true—would mean that book was a forgery..."
http://milesmathis.com/hawk3.pdf
"...I have written several papers critiquing Stephen Hawking, including a long one on his Brave NewWorld series for the BBC. But this is my first paper really linking my science research with my faked events research. I will use simple photo analysis and facial analysis to quickly show you the current Stephen Hawking is not the same person as the original Stephen Hawking.
This should not surprise you too much, especially if you know something about ALS. ALS is
Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, also known as Lou Gehrig's Disease. We are told Hawking has had ALS for over 52 years, which is a record by many decades. Jason Becker is the only person I have heard of who has lived more than 20 years with the disease, so there is about a three-decade difference between the longest survivor and the second longest survivor. That is a more than 100% differencebetween first and second place. It would be like Justin Gatlin running the 100 meters in 9.8 seconds,and Usain Bolt beating him with a time of 4.5 seconds. In other words, statistically it doesn't happen.
The average survival time for ALS is four years. When Hawking was first diagnosed in 1963, doctors gave him two years to live. And yet here we are, 52 years later and counting. Should you believe it? Well, no. Like Becker, it appears the real Hawking did beat the odds and live for about 20 years. But at some point he was replaced. I have no proof he died, but I assume that is why they replaced him.
He was a very useful public relations entity for physics, and they didn't want to lose him.
But rather than speculate on that, let us go right to the evidence. I won't call it proof, since of courseyou are free to disagree with me. This is an opinion piece, not a court transcript; and even if it were a stamped court finding, you would be free to disagree with it. You don't have to agree with anything anyone tells you, ever. Remember that. This paper is nothing more than presented evidence, evidence I find compelling. If you also find it compelling, fine. If you don't, also fine..."
"...Which means Hawking might not have written A Brief History of Time, which
came out in 1988. I haven't pinpointed the date, but that was about the time they made the switch. Mycurrent guess is early 80's, which—if true—would mean that book was a forgery..."
http://milesmathis.com/hawk3.pdf
