• NEW! LOWEST RATES EVER -- SUPPORT THE SHOW AND ENJOY THE VERY BEST PREMIUM PARACAST EXPERIENCE! Welcome to The Paracast+, eight years young! For a low subscription fee, you can download the ad-free version of The Paracast and the exclusive, member-only, After The Paracast bonus podcast, featuring color commentary, exclusive interviews, the continuation of interviews that began on the main episode of The Paracast. We also offer lifetime memberships! Flash! Take advantage of our lowest rates ever! Act now! It's easier than ever to susbcribe! You can sign up right here!

    Subscribe to The Paracast Newsletter!

Stephenville Case Not as Compelling as it Looks!!!!

Forums New posts

Free episodes:

L

Lavarat

Skilled Investigator
First of all what is with the tendency of witnesses to claim 1 mile wide diameter on so many newer sightings like this. Is there a reason this was spotted by a military base that has been very busy lately? People said they saw lights dancing. This could easily be blinking lights on a typical aircraft such as the blinking lights in the first video of the Stephsville sighting. I am not convinced yet that this could not be anthing more than another airforce active denial non lethal drone or spy plane in the black


http://youtube.com/watch?v=mxQtBzekPr8
 
I've been considering that possibility all along. The reported size of the craft is what leads people to an alien/mothership scenario. Could be we've developed a humongous piece of machinery ourselves. I doubt the mile long business though. It's very difficult to judge the size of something without concrete reference points.

It's at least something to consider.
 
Based solely on this one piece of video, I'd have to conclude that this is likely a man-made object. Do UFOs use blinking lights?

As is often the case, I can't match up the video evidence with the testimonials I've heard on this thing. When you hear people talk about this sighting—a semi-stationary object with typical aircraft blinking lights is not what you think of. Reminds me of the "Phoenix Lights." You hear people talk about what they saw, and it sure doesn't sound like the video we always see played over and over again. That footage , once again, looks like pretty standard stuff (flares etc). What's up with this discrepancy?

There simply HAS to be more to these cases than the video evidence suggests. But I'm at a loss. If something more unusual happened, why do we only get video of pretty ordinary-looking events? Our society is awash in cameras—both still and video—and I just don't understand why people describe these crazy things that happen but nobody got any decent pictures of them.
 
What's the story with the video—that's not related to the Texas UFO, is it? Like previous poster I feel that I've seen it before. Like most stuff out there could be CGI.
 
I back out of my original thread topic

this video was from 3 years ago by a man in Texas who did not tell anyone until after this sighting

so my fault

dump this thread
 
I don't believe anyone stated a mile wide, the hunter in Dublin, Texas said that it was at least as big as the ravine he was in, which he guessed was around 300 ft. Could be wrong, but I haven't heard any mile wide descriptions.
 
No, a mile was mentioned somewhere in the very beginning, but Sorrells corrected that. Said it was more like a thousand feet, but I hadn't heard the correction until later. I think Linda Howe stated it incorrectly to begin with.

To her credit, Linda Howe has been in Texas interviewing different witnesses that no one has heard from until now. Many seem to back up other witnesses. Some sightings were very different.
 
Lavarat said:
First of all what is with the tendency of witnesses to claim 1 mile wide diameter on so many newer sightings like this. Is there a reason this was spotted by a military base that has been very busy lately? People said they saw lights dancing. This could easily be blinking lights on a typical aircraft such as the blinking lights in the first video of the Stephsville sighting. I am not convinced yet that this could not be anthing more than another airforce active denial non lethal drone or spy plane in the black


http://youtube.com/watch?v=mxQtBzekPr8
Click to expand...

That video is almost surely something man-made, in my opinion. But what exactly leads you to believe that this craft being filmed is the Stephenville craft?
 
BrandonD said:
Lavarat said:
First of all what is with the tendency of witnesses to claim 1 mile wide diameter on so many newer sightings like this. Is there a reason this was spotted by a military base that has been very busy lately? People said they saw lights dancing. This could easily be blinking lights on a typical aircraft such as the blinking lights in the first video of the Stephsville sighting. I am not convinced yet that this could not be anthing more than another airforce active denial non lethal drone or spy plane in the black


http://youtube.com/watch?v=mxQtBzekPr8
Click to expand...

That video is almost surely something man-made, in my opinion. But what exactly leads you to believe that this craft being filmed is the Stephenville craft?
Click to expand...

Originally I found it listed on UFOCasebook.com on their main story of the day etc! Later it was taken down because the person filming said he took the video years ago.

Anyways it could be a blimp
 
Poi said:
No, a mile was mentioned somewhere in the very beginning, but Sorrells corrected that. Said it was more like a thousand feet, but I hadn't heard the correction until later. I think Linda Howe stated it incorrectly to begin with.
Click to expand...

i think the "mile" estimate is documented in this NUFORC report. This report immediate raises red flag. There is no way to look at a light in the sky from one vantage point and estimate altitude, distance and speed as the reporter does. It's simply fallacious.
 
Back
Top