• NEW! LOWEST RATES EVER -- SUPPORT THE SHOW AND ENJOY THE VERY BEST PREMIUM PARACAST EXPERIENCE! Welcome to The Paracast+, eight years young! For a low subscription fee, you can download the ad-free version of The Paracast and the exclusive, member-only, After The Paracast bonus podcast, featuring color commentary, exclusive interviews, the continuation of interviews that began on the main episode of The Paracast. We also offer lifetime memberships! Flash! Take advantage of our lowest rates ever! Act now! It's easier than ever to susbcribe! You can sign up right here!

    Subscribe to The Paracast Newsletter!

Stephenville Video Finally Leaked

Free episodes:

Lavarat

Skilled Investigator
http://www.ufocasebook.com/caronvideo.html


I dont understand what the hell this is or what people saw. First it was a Mile long craft, then it was orbs now these symbols????????
I am losing interest in this case it seems to be going nowhere.
 
that is totally bizarre. very similar to dorothy's lights.
thanks for sharing!
 
pixelsmith said:
that is totally bizarre. very similar to dorothy's lights.

That's what I've been trying to say!
http://theparacast.com/forums/march-2nd-show-dorothy-izatt-t-1725.html
 
Weather Balloon. Move Along.

Actually having a hard time viewing it. Keeps stopping after 30-60 seconds of the 9 minutes. The direct link is: http://www.disclose.tv/action/viewvideo/3218/

If anybody is aware of any mirrors or higher quality copies, please post a link here.

Somehow I can't shake the feeling that I'm looking at some sort of laser projection method. Something about the frequency of how the symbols are refreshed that feels similar to laser light shows I've seen in the past. I'm not clear on how it would be projected into open sky like that but it almost looks like at the beginning of the sequences there may be one of more sort of overlapping incoherent beams that then gradually become more focused until they start interfering with each other but that may just be the camera focus. I'm not really up to date on where laser projection technology is at right now so I could be totally off.

Can anyone who is familiar with modern laser tech comment?
 
David/Jeff - How would you fake what we see there if you wanted to? What do you make of it?

Was that an airplane I heard in the background at one point?
 
laser hologram could fake that, no problem.

In fact, it reminds me of a laser show at a concert or two I've gone to.

You wouldn't have to be the military to put this on. Promoters would have access to this kind of equipment.

I was interested in Stephensville when it was a big ship, but this flashing light thing doesn't interest me much at all.

Furthermore, if it was symbols, then the symbols would only mean something from one angle, and how effective is that.

I'm going to guess someone filmed a lavalamp or something, sped it up, and it's reflected inside a car window or something and that's what's being filmed.
 
The ATS thread has some good posts if you are willing to wade through it. This post is pretty compelling. From what I can make out the guy was filming a bright stationary object in the sky at maximum zoom using a JVC camcorder with the Night Alive function activated. Small vibrations under maximum zoom and long exposure are creating the patterns. Unless there are a bunch of eyewitnesses stepping up to go on the record as saying they saw this light show as depicted in the video I'd say a very reasonable explanation has been produced. It looks like the guy was not necessarily trying to hoax something but that the video was misinterpreted by the overeager third parties who saw it.
 
So, you're saying that what looks like glowing stringy things was really dancing lights? That seems reasonable, I guess.

Edit: Someone else pointed this out on the Dorothy Izzat thread.

"http://www.flixxy.com/laser-pointer-light-show.htm"

Looks very similar.
 
Scott Story said:
So, you're saying that what looks like glowing stringy things was really dancing lights?

No, it's seems likely that it was a stationary light or at least a fairly slow moving one from what I can tell. The NightAlive mode is holding the shutter open and micromovements in the camera are creating trails under maximum zoom. I was looking for a complete technical explanation of the NightAlive function but haven't found one yet. I think it is sort of like an automated shutter dragging technique that is often used with still cameras.
 
No, I think I get what you are explaining. The object was stationary, the but the camera was sensitive the vibration, and the cameraman is causing the jiggles. I'm not versed much in cameras, by the way, so apologies to those who rightly noted that I'm slow on such matters.
 
What makes it seem a bit unusual is that the video seems to consist of distinct sequences of the patterns that stop and start which seems to run counter to the idea of a stationary light source. Without knowing the precise details of the NightAlive function my guess would be that the distinct sequences are marked by the beginning and end of the shutter/image processing activity that this function is doing which is what makes them appear to sort of stop and then start again in a different position.
 
It's a laser light show. The give away is the fact that there's nothing but blackness and no ambient light what so ever. Not to mention the time on the tape is inconsistent.
 
I truly believe this is a distraction or somekind of disinfo. Its bizarre because the reports of these so called symbols, obviously laser lights, started like a week after the original sighting.

Does anyone agree this video very likely is bogus? can lasers be done like this?
 
I really think the explanation of laser show is unnecessary given that the video has been reproduced exactly with known methods:
<object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/OT2-aFiKWhA&rel=1&border=0"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/OT2-aFiKWhA&rel=1&border=0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent"width="425" height="355"></embed></object>

At the beginning of the original video you can see the stationary light(most likely a bright star) that the guy starts zooming in on. If this is a distraction then everything I've read so far says we have the believers to thank for it.
 
Cool find on the "Night Alive" video. I'll have to to try using that feature on my camera and filming a ceiling fan. Anyone wanna bet it comes out looking like a drone craft?
 
Tommy Allison said:
It's a laser light show. The give away is the fact that there's nothing but blackness and no ambient light what so ever. Not to mention the time on the tape is inconsistent.

It would be easy to dub an audio track of traffic going by too. I suppose you could explain the time inconsistency by saying it was edited down, but that's lame.

Once again; a shaky video camera, unclear image, no questions answered. I'm getting tired of this.
 
I don't know how to attach a video on here, but it looks like it is not a laser show, but the talked about "night alive" function which dorkbot refers to.

http://youtube.com/watch?v=b4IhaXBQdcQ

This video reminds me of the Haiti debunking. And although I know nothing of Dorothy's Izzat story, if it is similar, it would seem likely to be the same thing.
 
TClaeys said:
And although I know nothing of Dorothy's Izzat story, if it is similar, it would seem likely to be the same thing.

Izatt's footage is most definitely not the same thing. If I put on my skeptibunker hat even I would have to say that if Izatt has produced 600 Super8mm color analog film cartridges with ~3,000 individual frames of interest by accident or purposeful forgery, the mechanism is entirely different from the in-camera digital processing of the JVC NightAlive equipped cameras.

They are two entirely different cases, shot under entirely different circumstances with entirely different equipment by entirely different people. Any fleeting similarity seems to be coincidental, or, if you prefer, synchronistic.
 
dorkbot said:
TClaeys said:
And although I know nothing of Dorothy's Izzat story, if it is similar, it would seem likely to be the same thing.

Izatt's footage is most definitely not the same thing.

I have no idea what her video is or looks like, but I thought someone said they looked the same or similar. I could have been wrong.

And look at that, my youtube link turned into a video!! Wait a minute, how do explain THAT??
 
TClaeys said:
And look at that, my youtube link turned into a video!! Wait a minute, how do explain THAT??

the post was last modified by one of the hosts, no doubt he embedded the link for you.

a possible explaination, based on observation
i could be wrong
 
Back
Top