• NEW! LOWEST RATES EVER -- SUPPORT THE SHOW AND ENJOY THE VERY BEST PREMIUM PARACAST EXPERIENCE! Welcome to The Paracast+, eight years young! For a low subscription fee, you can download the ad-free version of The Paracast and the exclusive, member-only, After The Paracast bonus podcast, featuring color commentary, exclusive interviews, the continuation of interviews that began on the main episode of The Paracast. We also offer lifetime memberships! Flash! Take advantage of our lowest rates ever! Act now! It's easier than ever to susbcribe! You can sign up right here!

    Subscribe to The Paracast Newsletter!

Texas Trail Cam Captures Image of a UFO?

Free episodes:

Christopher O'Brien

Back in the Saddle Aginn
Staff member
Article by Micah Hanks: Graelian Report
It has long been one of the chief arguments against the existence of creatures like Bigfoot: why, in spite of the prevalence of motion-activated trail cameras that cover much of America’s woodland landscape, has such a creature never been photographed?

I had a discussion about this with a forestry and natural resources major from Clemson, SC, only weeks ago, who asked me the question above. While we spoke, I admitted there have been some strange things captured by trail cameras, such as the infamous “Jacob’s Creature” photos. The official explanation for the creature in these images was said to be a mangy bear; though this doesn’t seem entirely likely based on what the photos and later analysis detail, it doesn’t rule out other possible explanations that may not warrant anything out of the ordinary. That’s why, of all things, the notion of strange aerial phenomenon being captured by a motion-sensitive camera seems even less likely than a flesh-and-blood critter wandering into view, just in time to say “cheese.” Still, stranger things have happened, as the video below shows us: what is the weird object hovering in the background of these Texas trail camera photos?

<object width="640" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/epNirHdwhrA&color1=0x234900&color2=0x4e9e00&hl=en_US&feature=player_embedded&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/epNirHdwhrA&color1=0x234900&color2=0x4e9e00&hl=en_US&feature=player_embedded&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" allowScriptAccess="always" width="640" height="385"></embed></object>

Writing for the LA Times‘ outdoor and adventure blog Outposts, writer Kelly Burgess included testimony from a Fort Worth, Texas resident named Lisa Brock-Piekarski, who noted that “There’s nothing back there but trees and sky. There’s no hills, no buildings, nothing back there. It’s all flat.” Nonetheless, the strange row of illuminations appeared in not just one, but several consecutive images taken throughout the evening, which appeared to show a large, airborne object in the distance.

What we do know about the camera is that it operates using infrared, rather than a flash, and is motion-activated, like the majority of cameras of this type used for hunting and wildlife observing. Brock-Piekarski told reporters they’ve captured falling stars, but nothing quite as uniform as the object in these photos. “Anytime there’s a meteor shower or anything, you can see it a lot better, but I’ve never seen anything like that.” Brock-Piekarski’s land is also in Archer City, which is just 20 miles south of Sheppard Air Force Base in nearby Wichita Falls. Local station KXAS-TV (who did the piece featured in the video above) contacted the base, but said officials “did not immediately return requests.”

When viewing the individual photographs (several were posted online here) one can see that the object in question moves slightly, drifting to the right over a period covering at least an hour just before dawn as the time stamp on the photos indicates. One of the earlier images bears a time stamp of 5:18 AM, whereas two later images took place consecutively at 6:06 AM and 6:07 AM. Photos taken as the camera was triggered by game in the area after sunrise, occurring several minutes before 7:00 AM, show a clear background; nothing but open sky is visible in the distance behind the location of the strange object from only an hour earlier.

So what was it? Some outdoor enthusiasts, posting anonymously on the site Texas Bowhunter Forums, have suggested everything from droplets of water gathered along a spider’s web, to a string of LED lights. Another item of speculation might involve the potential for mirages, perhaps due to city lights in the distance reflected off moisture pockets present in the atmosphere (this sounds very similar to the classic debunkings of the Project Bluebook era, but it can indeed occur). However, none of these suggestions would explain the peculiar way the object appears to “drift” over the course of the morning as the photos show. Until further information about the location and other contextual details emerge, the identity of this strange illumination over Texas will likely remain unidentified. However, if you have any information about this or other sightings of strange aerial phenomena in Archer City or other Texas locales, please email them to [email protected].
 
Which links? To Micah's article or the youtube embed? Both show up fine on my screen...

Second paragraph from the bottom: (When viewing the individual photographs (several were posted online here) one can see that the object in question moves slightly,...). The "here" is a link to a forum. I have linked to the images they have up on that forum below.

I dont thik this one is related but was on the forum:
ufo-game-camera-02-zoom.jpg


ufo-game-camera-06.jpg


ufo-game-camera-05.jpg


ufo-game-camera.jpg


---------- Post added at 07:10 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:08 PM ----------



After looking at this last one I think the "dew on a spiders web" explanation seems very plausible.
 
Very odd looking photographs. This is the kind of thing you would think we would be seeing more of with all of the cameras covering practically every square mile of the earth's surface but we don't. Or at least they aren't reported as often as you'd think would be the case. Looking at the photo in the video I get the impression of a large disk with lights around the edge.
 
So one suggestion is that it may be a spider web much closer to the camera with the infra red source reflecting back---when the sun comes up the fine web disappears (spoiler alert--that is how we used to make things fly in movies before computers).

It seems reasonable. Were there just these three?

Lance

Yes, only these three. The thing that solidifies the web/thread theory for me is the first of the night images in contrast to the other 2 images. Notice how the deers ear is close to the camera and is reflecting and diffusing the source lighting. In that image you see less reflection from the water droplets and you get a wider sense of the thread. I can almost see it continue off to the right? Not sure it could just be my imagination on that part. But in the other images the deer is farther away and the source light hits the water droplets first making them brighter.

Thats my armchair analysis for the day. I could be wrong, but it just seems more likely to me.
 
Thats my armchair analysis for the day. I could be wrong, but it just seems more likely to me.

That seems to be a reasonable analysis. It could be that but I'm leaning more toward an inter-dimensional craft full of aliens on safari checking out the deer there. I can almost hear them arguing over whether doe-season has started or not.
 
Interesting and plausible hypothesis (dew on a strand of Spiders web close to the camera lens).

Noticing the temp info embedded in the bottom of the photos, I'm curious if dew could form in such a perfect series (including spacing) - or at all- at 80 degrees?

Just asking...
 
I am leaning towards the spider web theory as well. I think Ron hit it on the head with his explanation.
 
So one suggestion is that it may be a spider web much closer to the camera with the infra red source reflecting back---when the sun comes up the fine web disappears
Good hypothesis-- I mentioned your possible explanation to Ray Stanford. He is from the west TX hill country where this was shot and he told me that it is highly unlikely that this is dew on a spider web. He said to look closely at the spacing between the bright and dim spots. His preliminary view is that it may be real. I'll talk to him later and have him explain further.
 
Looks like they have figured out it is a mechanical malfunction of the camera.

"For some unknown reason, the camera shutter was remaining open, and the infrared strobe fired it would catch a bank of lights," said Fletcher L. Gray, Texas MUFON chief investigator. "The strobe has 14 LED-type bulbs across and with five bulbs vertical, with a total of 70 LED bulbs. If you look at the photo of the what was called a UFO, you will count 14 lights that matches the 14 bulbs in the camera."
The whole article can be found here.
 
Looks like they have figured out it is a mechanical malfunction of the camera.

"For some unknown reason, the camera shutter was remaining open, and the infrared strobe fired it would catch a bank of lights," said Fletcher L. Gray, Texas MUFON chief investigator. "The strobe has 14 LED-type bulbs across and with five bulbs vertical, with a total of 70 LED bulbs. If you look at the photo of the what was called a UFO, you will count 14 lights that matches the 14 bulbs in the camera."
The whole article can be found here.

I would like to see some sort of effort to reconstruct this.
 
and the infrared strobe fired it would catch a bank of lights," said Fletcher L. Gray, Texas MUFON chief investigator.

It is still a mystery to me as to how the image was recorded by the camera. It seems that the light from the LED strobe would have to be reflected off some surface "in the field" and no such surface has been described.

If the shutter was stuck in an open configuration, I would expect that the recorded image would be overexposed and blurred due to multiple firings of the strobe.

The reconstruction of the event, as suggested above by Ron Collins, certainly is advised.
 
Back
Top