NEW! LOWEST RATES EVER -- SUPPORT THE SHOW AND ENJOY THE VERY BEST PREMIUM PARACAST EXPERIENCE! Welcome to The Paracast+, eight years young! For a low subscription fee, you can download the ad-free version of The Paracast and the exclusive, member-only, After The Paracast bonus podcast, featuring color commentary, exclusive interviews, the continuation of interviews that began on the main episode of The Paracast. We also offer lifetime memberships! Flash! Take advantage of our lowest rates ever! Act now! It's easier than ever to susbcribe! You can sign up right here!

Reply to thread

Message

Not read it but I do think Michael Cremo can be taken a lot more seriously than Von Daniken or Tsooookalisisalooka (sorry, can't be bothered finding out how to spell Georgey-boy's name, even though it would have been quicker than writing this sentence to explain that)

In fact it's a book on my 'must get sometime' list. I expect there is a decent amount of stuff in their that is based partly in fact. That's quite a generous thing to say given how badly some stuff in AA let's down the whole 'hidden history' type research.

It's the stand-out out-of-place-artefacts that really get me going. Some of them are just mind-blowing. Now, I don't obviously know the providence of some of those items but the lack of debunking on some of them is pretty lacking - like no-one wants to touch the subject with a bargepole lest they cannot debunk!

<blockquote data-quote="Goggs Mackay" data-source="post: 149593" data-attributes="member: 4654">Not read it but I do think Michael Cremo can be taken a lot more seriously than Von Daniken or Tsooookalisisalooka (sorry, can&#039;t be bothered finding out how to spell Georgey-boy&#039;s name, even though it would have been quicker than writing this sentence to explain that<img src="/forum/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/biggrin.png"&nbsp; class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":D" title="Big Grin&nbsp; &nbsp; :D" data-shortname=":D" />)&nbsp;In fact it&#039;s a book on my &#039;must get sometime&#039; list. I expect there is a decent amount of stuff in their that is based partly in fact. That&#039;s quite a generous thing to say given how badly some stuff in AA let&#039;s down the whole &#039;hidden history&#039; type research.&nbsp;It&#039;s the stand-out out-of-place-artefacts that really get me going. Some of them are just mind-blowing. Now, I don&#039;t obviously know the providence of some of those items but the lack of debunking on some of them is pretty lacking - like no-one wants to touch the subject with a bargepole lest they cannot debunk!</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Goggs Mackay, post: 149593, member: 4654"] Not read it but I do think Michael Cremo can be taken a lot more seriously than Von Daniken or Tsooookalisisalooka (sorry, can't be bothered finding out how to spell Georgey-boy's name, even though it would have been quicker than writing this sentence to explain that:D) In fact it's a book on my 'must get sometime' list. I expect there is a [I]decent [/I]amount of stuff in their that is based partly in fact. That's quite a generous thing to say given how badly some stuff in AA let's down the whole 'hidden history' type research. It's the stand-out out-of-place-artefacts that really get me going. Some of them are just mind-blowing. Now, I don't obviously know the providence of some of those items but the lack of debunking on some of them is pretty lacking - like no-one wants to touch the subject with a bargepole lest they cannot debunk! [/QUOTE]

Verification