Building 7
Drew, don't you also think that the world is run by reptiles, or is that just your buddy David Icke. If that's the case, it means you're prone to believing stupid things and your opinions are tainted with that. If not, I apologize.
The topic is whether the CIA is behind the free fall collapse of building 7. Instead of addressing the evidence about the CIA relying on false flag operations there is now a new topic in this thread.
Drew Hempel believe reptilians run the world. Does anyone have any evidence for this? I mean it might be considered off topic by a moderator.
Oops a moderator raised this question -- or is it an accusation? Ah how I love
false accusations! No evidence presented. Nothing to do with Building 7. But there it is folks -- instead of discussing or replying to the evidence there is now a false accusation against me -- an
ad hominem by a so-called moderator on theparacast! haha. Hilarious.
Drew Hempel thinks reptilians run the world. Then there's a second false accusation dealing with the free fall collapse of building 7.
Drew Hempel is buddies with David Icke. Hmm. Maybe the topic,
with no evidence, of Drew Hempel being buddies with David Icke is off-topic but then a moderator did bring it up. Does the moderator have any evidence for this claim?
Nope.
If the moderator has any evidence please present it. But I guess if a moderator thinks
making two claims with no evidence -- two claims with no evidence and both claims
having nothing to do with building 7 -- except, of course, that they're
ad hominems against someone presenting strong evidence that the CIA relies on false flag operations, including a false flag operation that is essentially the same as 9/11 -- Operations Northwoods....
I think what is going on is more than apparent. Since people do not want to face the evidence -- since people are unwilling to reply to the evidence -- then such people feel forced to
make up false accusations with no evidence targeting the person who presented the evidence.
If this ad hominem strategy is used by a moderator then it's a safe tactic.
Hilarious!
Then again if a person was actually interested in the evidence I presented it would take a full 24 hours or so to process all of it -- watching 9 hours of the History Channel documentary
the Men who Killed Kennedy -- a documentary that aired once and then was censored. Then watching
Mohamed Atta and the Flying Circus which proves that the
CIA trained the 9/11 plane hijackers. Then watching
the Secret Heartbeat of America which
proves that the CIA is the largest deliverer of drugs into the U.S. Then listening to the Dan Marvin podcast interview which details how
the CIA uses false flag operations to do mass assassinations. Then listening to the podcast interviews with Douglas Valentine which proves that the DEA War against Drugs is
a false flag operation controlled by
the CIA, the largest trader of drugs on the planet.
No -- it's much easier to just
make stuff up with no evidence --
make stuff up about the person posting the evidence! Not only is there no evidence presented but it has nothing to do with the CIA planning 9/11.
Now let's look at
the CIA again and their history of false flag operations.