• NEW! LOWEST RATES EVER -- SUPPORT THE SHOW AND ENJOY THE VERY BEST PREMIUM PARACAST EXPERIENCE! Welcome to The Paracast+, eight years young! For a low subscription fee, you can download the ad-free version of The Paracast and the exclusive, member-only, After The Paracast bonus podcast, featuring color commentary, exclusive interviews, the continuation of interviews that began on the main episode of The Paracast. We also offer lifetime memberships! Flash! Take advantage of our lowest rates ever! Act now! It's easier than ever to susbcribe! You can sign up right here!

    Subscribe to The Paracast Newsletter!

The Lisbon Treaty

Free episodes:

conor

Skilled Investigator
In Ireland, we are going to vote on Friday to either reject or accept the Lisbon Treaty. This is the second time we are going to vote on this treaty. We voted No last time, and the government went to Brussells to get gaurantees that Ireland would remain neutral and keep a commissioner within the European commission. They got to keep the commissioner, and were given assurances on nuetrality. The first time there was a vigorous No campaign which I don't think anyone was really expecting. They were headed by Declan Ganley of Libertas, a non entity in Irish politics before this. Suddenly, he bursts onto the scene, a business man with dealings with people from the US military, British hedge funds and the aluminium business in Russia. He may have good intentions, he may not. But he is a mighty suspicious character.

Anyway, the far left are saying vote No. The far right are saying vote No. Most of the political parties in parliament are saying vote Yes. But people are really disillusioned with politics in general at the moment. There is a history of cronyism in this country, golden hand shakes and bribes. The most notorious political party with regards to these sorts of scandals are Fianna Fail, the current government. Traditionally, they have been the most popular party, with their main opposition being Fine Gael. They are not parties with opposing ideologies as in the US. Rather, they have their routes in Civil War politics of the Irish war of independence.

Anyway, Fianna Fail's popularity has plumetted to record lows. Our current economic crisis is being handled ... well, it's hard to know at this stage if it is actually being handled properly at all. One of our banks has been nationalised and they are in the process of creating a bad bank to take all the toxic loans. This really is uncharted territory - they are either going to save the country, or make a bad situation infinitly worse. We the tax payer could be paying for this for, well, our children could be paying for this. And I'm still pretty young!

Anyway, this is the background to the whole Lisbon Treaty referendum, whether we should vote for a more coherent Europe, and potentially (and I cannot stress potentially enough) give away our freedoms (this is really a long shot, as each individual state decides upon it's own laws and institutions, and will still do that under the treaty, but as a worst case scenario, we could potentially lose our identity to a wider European state - well that's the fear behind the No campaign anyway).

Should we be annoyed we are voting again? The Yes campaign has really stepped up their campaigning this time, and a lot of people are worried, given the current economic reality, and being a small country which needs foreign investment, that this will damage Ireland. Some people read the treaty as allowing Europe to be more effective in the things it does i.e. where to alocate money for incentives to industry and such. On the other hand, some see Europe as the evil empire, and worst case scenario is that it has the potential to become one. But I think that is really REALLY unlikely. But if in 50 years down the line some right wing organisation got control of the European parliament ... unlikely, but there is a real feeling over here that empire is bad. However, to call the EU an empire is a stretch by my surmisation.

Anyway, another reason people are voting No is to express dissatisfaction with the government. This, in my opinion, is wrong. There will be consequences if we vote No. We cannot be thrown out of the EU, but Europe wants to go ahead with this, and we could lose all sorts of clout within the corridoors of power in Europe. The truth is that Europe has been really good for Ireland. We joined in the 70s, and things were bad before that. Emmigration was through the roof. This was a land with very little oppurtunity. The EU gave us large incentives and played no small part in making Ireland, a small country, an international player which was viewed as investible with a highly educated work force. And when things were good (90s to a year ago) things were GOOD. Yes, there was corruption, but that was within the country, nothing to do with Europe.

So, all eyes are firmly fixed on this little country of ours. I'm not going to say how I voted last time, or how I intend to vote this time, but it feels like there is a larger battle being fought upon our soil. All sorts of interests are involved, on both the Yes and the No side. A British far right organisation applauded us for voting No, saying that having to vote a second time was an example of the lack of democracy within Europe, to which an Irish member of the parliament responded, "The Irish parliament decided to run the treaty again, and we have not had to do anything we didn't want to since we were ruled by the british empire." These guys are exactly the type of people who opposed Irish independence! This is just one example of how many interests are involved.

So, what say you all? What should we do, from an outside perspective? I have tried to paint as full a picture as possible, that's why this post is so long, but I really would like to see what you all think of this.

Conor:rolleyes:
 
I voted No, and i have no problem, telling people, why i voted now NO. Europe wants to move on with the treaty, but if we decide to vote no again, the treaty is dead and Europe will not let that happen.

Once one country votes against it, the treaty can not be made law by the European Parliament. That is my understanding of it anyway. Of course, Europe could come back again, if a no vote happens, and ask us to vote again for a third time. Democratic politics, what a joke.

I think it, will pass this time, because people are worried about being outside Europe, and upsetting the leaders of European Nations. Recently, Leaders in Europe, have been falling all over themselves, offering us all type of guarantee's to help us. I still have many problems with the treaty, but the guarantee's have helped, so i might change my vote to Yes instead of No.

Ireland , is only a small nation. We can not survive outside Europe. It just common sense. If we voted NO again. Europe could easily in the future scrape this treaty and develop a new treaty. That will leave Ireland by itself while the rest move on and leave us behind. A little information, we have to put this to the people under or Constitution, the rest of Europe do not except for the Czech republic and Ireland. The other European nations, pass it through Parliament under their laws.If this was put to European people's of Europe must analysts, believe it would not be passed by their populations.

It a treaty that has gone under the radar of this European people. This treaty will decide how Europe goes about it's business in the future. Yet, if you asked a person, man or women in Germany, France, or England, have you heard of the Lisbon treaty. You probably get a dumb look from them "what is that" and yet this treaty has Defense, economic, and many social issue's which will effect them if it is passed.
 
I'm hoping it's a "no" vote but I assume they will just keep bringing it back until they eventually get the "yes" vote. The whole thing is incredibly shady in my opinion.
 
This time around I believe Ireland's only choice is "Yes" vote.

Declan Ganley? Wouldn't trust that guy as far as I could throw him.


My (Irish) wife is going to vote "Yes" tomorrow although she went with the "No" side last time.
Anyway ... Good Luck tomorrow Éire.
By the way when's the results? Midnight?
 
The reason we are getting to vote on the treaty is because it's in our constitution to vote on referendums. A lot of countries within Europe don't have that written into their constitution. So they didn't vote for it. However, their public representatives are the ones that came up with the treaty. Even if you are totally disillusioned with politics, they are elected, and that is the way of things in this world at the moment (utopia has not been realised and, in my opinion, probably never will).

There are two reasons the treaty is so complex.

1. This was negotiated by and for twenty seven different states, which all have different laws and spitulations that they want in the treaty.

2. It's a legal ducument. And they are really REALLY complex.

Other than that, our constitution is the same and the way we run our country is still completely up to us. Europe is a good thing IMO.

Oh, by the way, if you haven't already guessed, I voted Yes the first time, and I'm going to vote Yes again. This is not a vote for or against our shambolic gov't - they should have nothing to do with your decision.

Another reason, for me personally, is that, when you have the far right telling you to vote No, and the far left telling you to vote the same way, well, I think in such a situation the only option is to vote Yes!;)
 
Another reason, for me personally, is that, when you have the far right telling you to vote No, and the far left telling you to vote the same way, well, I think in such a situation the only option is to vote Yes!;)

Hit. Nail. Head.
Well said, I agree.
 
You do realize that there is a caveat in there that allows them to add anything they like to the agreement at a later date once it has passed without the need for approval by anyone should they realize they forgot something, eh? That alone is reason to vote "no."
 
Also:

"Declan Ganley's 'No to Lisbon Campaign' has been bankrolled by a secretive British hedge fund boss that made hundreds of millions of euros "short selling" Irish banks last year."

Regulatory filings reveal that the wealthy investor Crispin Odey donated to "Pro-Democracy: Libertas.eu" on May 28. The Mayfair-based hedge fund boss also donated nearly €15,000 worth of services to the organisation.

Libertas is also backed by other London financiers.

Odey, who received a near €35m bonus last year, was one of the leading short sellers of Anglo Irish Bank before the bank imploded when the Country was almost brough to its knees."



...
 
Also:

"Declan Ganley's 'No to Lisbon Campaign' has been bankrolled by a secretive British hedge fund boss that made hundreds of millions of euros "short selling" Irish banks last year."

Regulatory filings reveal that the wealthy investor Crispin Odey donated to "Pro-Democracy: Libertas.eu" on May 28. The Mayfair-based hedge fund boss also donated nearly €15,000 worth of services to the organisation.

Libertas is also backed by other London financiers.

Odey, who received a near €35m bonus last year, was one of the leading short sellers of Anglo Irish Bank before the bank imploded when the Country was almost brough to its knees."



...

Rupert Murdoch, Declan Ganley, Neo cons, all pushing for a No vote (all Murdochs papers over here, which thakfully aren't them all, pushed for a No vote), and people still think that it's an inherenhtly bad document, even though they are exactly the same sort of people who would at one moment criticise all these people, and then at the next criticise Lisbon. It seems to me that a No vote would be playing right into the hands of some very VERY dodgy people who really don't have our best interest at heart. You gotta ask yourself this, what does this tell us about all that one world order crap?? A No vote is a support for all of the people that have been (rightly) vilified over the last decade especially. Obviously, there's more to it, but it makes you think.


Anyway, it passed.:rolleyes: For better or for worse ....


Conor
 
Too little too late but people really need to start looking at policies rather than personalities in these types of debates. It drives me nuts! :mad:
 
well, there is the fact that it is a more social document than Nice was, giving more rights to the people. some say that it didnt go far enough, but people who say "we're fine as we are" and think that our current relationship with europe is ok, but the lisbon treaty is "bad" compared to it are simply misinformed.

another thing about lisbon is the burocracy that it gets rid of. in europe it has been notoriously hard to get things done i.e. allocating money for incentives for industry etc. These things could take years. that has been considerably lessened by lisbon.

People say that there are extraordinary powers given to the EU as opposed to individual countries. I would say that that's just scaremongering. The treaty is a natural step forward. A country still does not have to do anything it doesnt want to do. This is not a united states of europe. it was agreed by our governments over a period of nearly 20 yrs. It is a horribly complex document. But however you feel about politicians, we elected them, and a practical alternative to representational democracy is not forthcoming.

Ultimately, i think the thing that will surprise people the most is how little it will effect their lives on the surface. But go beneath that, and you have a political and social document by which we can all benefit from each other. There is an evil empire to the east, and one to the west, but neither of them is europe.
 
Back
Top