• NEW! LOWEST RATES EVER -- SUPPORT THE SHOW AND ENJOY THE VERY BEST PREMIUM PARACAST EXPERIENCE! Welcome to The Paracast+, eight years young! For a low subscription fee, you can download the ad-free version of The Paracast and the exclusive, member-only, After The Paracast bonus podcast, featuring color commentary, exclusive interviews, the continuation of interviews that began on the main episode of The Paracast. We also offer lifetime memberships! Flash! Take advantage of our lowest rates ever! Act now! It's easier than ever to susbcribe! You can sign up right here!

    Subscribe to The Paracast Newsletter!

today's multiple choice

Free episodes:

Wade

FeralNormal master
there may be right or wrong answers here as it may be all four...or none

1. oppurtunistic liar
2. cretin in denial
3. just doing his job
4. attempted hero


BBC iPlayer - Newshour: 06/12/2012 (2100 GMT)
BBC - Podcasts and Downloads - Newshour look for 6/12/12 broadcast

no doubt many of you guys have heard by now about the incident in new york where a photographer ( R. Umar Abbasi ) took the photo of a man ( Ki-Suck Han) who was pushed off the platform in front of an oncoming train in the moments before his death. it made the cover of the new york post. bbc newshour got one of the first interviews of the photographer about the incident and what went through his mind at the time. this is a must listen guys, it's at the top of the show .

i have to say, not being there i find his recall and course of action quite dubious. especially his instinct. being that he is a professional photographer i would have to guess his first instinct is to capture the event without much regard about the circumstances and in that i suppose one could argue the guy was just doing his job, as unsavory as it was, and not unlike what a war photographers have done he did was he was trained to do, maybe he even now regrets it, perhaps if he was in any other profession he would have reacted differently. in the interview it sounds as if he is trying to convince himself he took the best course of action at the time , maybe he did. but if i were interviewing him i would ask him if had the person on the tracks been related to him would his instincts have been any different. i await your opinions. Also if what the photographer said is true about all the iphones coming out after the incident being disrepectful and such then these pictures should be all over the net soon and we'll see them whether we look for them or not.

Should The New York Post's Subway Photo Have Been Published? - NYTimes.com

as i write this a banner at the top of the forum is telling me that three people have unfriended me, their loss :(
 
I'd heard of this story. I've not heard the interview yet but was this photographer taking a photo after the guy was pushed or before? I can hardly think he can be blamed cos he could hardly have forseen this happening or am I missing something?
I've mixed feelings. Anything happening in public has to be fair game legally to photograph but also there should be a moral choice not to intrude on a family's grief in what is obviously a sickening and extremely sad incident. If it was my father or mother I'd probably go find this photographer and:
1. Kick the living shit out of him and damn the consequences.
2. Post doggydoo through his letterbox.
3. Try to start a viral campaign aimed at making the world see him as a completely heartless prick.

Shame on the newspaper too. Run the story, yes. Print the photo? No 'in the public interest' I can see. My father is a journalist and I can absolutely promise you that he and many other journalists are completely ethical. He turned down several high-paying jobs as it would have meant working for the UK's tabloid press (such as 'The Sun') which are internationally known for being pretty low down the scale of ethics.
 
Back
Top