NEW! LOWEST RATES EVER -- SUPPORT THE SHOW AND ENJOY THE VERY BEST PREMIUM PARACAST EXPERIENCE! Welcome to The Paracast+, eight years young! For a low subscription fee, you can download the ad-free version of The Paracast and the exclusive, member-only, After The Paracast bonus podcast, featuring color commentary, exclusive interviews, the continuation of interviews that began on the main episode of The Paracast. We also offer lifetime memberships! Flash! Take advantage of our lowest rates ever! Act now! It's easier than ever to susbcribe! You can sign up right here!

Reply to thread

Message

So basically they either have to outsmart the top geniuses or they have to be the ones who bag the stuff that fell from the sky and then smart enough to make sense of it. I really can't make the equation work for TTSA for that latter alternative either.

First we would have to assume they have acquired some physical objects/material that would enable them to make such breakthroughs. This is how they told that part of the story in NY Times:

Here's how Elizondo answers to a question about those in general terms, like possible "materials", "residues", "special isotopes":
2017-12-20 - New Interview with Luis Elizondo

To me that doesn't sound like they would have actual crafts or devices or other similar significant parts, but rather something like possible parts of meteorites, spy satellites etc. that may have partially burned on reentry etc.

If they had actually found something that would enable revolutionary technology, I don't think he would have told about it like that. And would the government and military really leave that to the hands of a private company like Bigelow, let alone give any sort of access to it to a startup with questionable credentials, like TTSA? And if they had something like that, would they just stop funding such a project? It just doesn't add up.

<blockquote data-quote="Realm" data-source="post: 267524" data-attributes="member: 9250">So basically they either have to outsmart the top geniuses or they have to be the ones who bag the stuff that fell from the sky and then smart enough to make sense of it. I really can&#039;t make the equation work for TTSA for that latter alternative either.First we would have to assume they have acquired some physical objects/material that would enable them to make such breakthroughs. This is how they told that part of the story in NY Times:Here&#039;s how Elizondo answers to a question about those in general terms, like possible &quot;materials&quot;, &quot;residues&quot;, &quot;special isotopes&quot;:<a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=244&amp;v=W0Vdc4z3mt4" target="_blank">2017-12-20 - New Interview with Luis Elizondo</a>To me that doesn&#039;t sound like they would have actual crafts or devices or other similar significant parts, but rather something like possible parts of meteorites, spy satellites etc. that may have partially burned on reentry etc.If they had actually found something that would enable revolutionary technology, I don&#039;t think he would have told about it like that. And would the government and military really leave that to the hands of a private company like Bigelow, let alone give any sort of access to it to a startup with questionable credentials, like TTSA? And if they had something like that, would they just stop funding such a project? It just doesn&#039;t add up.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Realm, post: 267524, member: 9250"] So basically they either have to outsmart the top geniuses or they have to be the ones who bag the stuff that fell from the sky and then smart enough to make sense of it. I really can't make the equation work for TTSA for that latter alternative either. First we would have to assume they have acquired some physical objects/material that would enable them to make such breakthroughs. This is how they told that part of the story in NY Times: Here's how Elizondo answers to a question about those in general terms, like possible "materials", "residues", "special isotopes": [URL='https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=244&v=W0Vdc4z3mt4']2017-12-20 - New Interview with Luis Elizondo[/URL] To me that doesn't sound like they would have actual crafts or devices or other similar significant parts, but rather something like possible parts of meteorites, spy satellites etc. that may have partially burned on reentry etc. If they had actually found something that would enable revolutionary technology, I don't think he would have told about it like that. And would the government and military really leave that to the hands of a private company like Bigelow, let alone give any sort of access to it to a startup with questionable credentials, like TTSA? And if they had something like that, would they just stop funding such a project? It just doesn't add up. [/QUOTE]

Verification