Okay, well that’s a weird page to cite, Padre Tomfortas. And before I move on, if you doubt that Wikipedia is overrun with operatives who have a clear agenda to discredit and purge anything and everything that the government considers to be sensitive information, then you’ve either never edited at Wikipedia, or if you did, you weren’t paying attention to the way the game is played there. In a similar manner, Google is effectively now a US intelligence asset, and I’m sure that facebook is as well. He who laughs does so at his own peril, and there’s ample evidence that this shit is really happening right now:
BBC NEWS | Technology | Wikipedia 'shows CIA page edits'
Wiki Thought Control: The CIA, The Pentagon, Homeland Security, and the Encyclopedia | HuffPost
Julian Assange - Google Is Not What It Seems
[MEDIA=youtube]MICXf6viakc[/MEDIA]
(the original SourceFed video has vanished from YouTube, apparently: SourceFed )
Google's rigged search engine results (you can check this for yourself):
[ATTACH]6812[/ATTACH]
How Covert Agents Infiltrate the Internet to Manipulate, Deceive, and Destroy Reputations
Glenn Greenwald, The Intercept, 2014
Leaked by Edward Snowden:
The Art of Deception: Training for a New Generation of Online Covert Operations - The Intercept
Now back to your source material. After the transcript of Ingo Swann “remote viewing” Jupiter (where he sounds like he’s on some good drugs, lol), I found this:
“Much of this operational data is still highly classified, however in an interview conducted by Tom Snyder on Joe McMoneagle one of the most gifted of INSCOM's remote viewers February 1st, 1996:
"Joe: One of the amazing things about remote viewing is the specific targets that they're probably most accurate with, are high energy type targets, or targets that have high energy chain state. And uh, nuclear material has that kind of energy. And historically we've always done very, very well with nuclear targets. So in this age of the attempts for venting the proliferation of nuclear weapons, or the spread of nuclear material, remote viewing could provide a substantial help for that.
Tom: You say we've had remarkable success, could you give us an example of something that's come from remote imaging that's turned out to be truly useful information that has helped us in terms of our national security?
Joe: Oh sure, in one case we were targeting a building, that was a very large building in the northern part of the USSR. And, no one knew what was going on inside the building. And targeting that building, I drew out a drawing of a submarine, I described its uh (canad) tubes, how many tubes it had, a large flat area on the rear deck, described it as a large submarine, and it was a new Typhoon Class Submarine. We were able to predict when it was actually going to be rolled out of the building, and in that way they were able to target other collection systems.
Tom: And all this you did doing remote viewing?
Joe: Yes, from Virginia.(67)"
The inherent difficulty with RV or Remote Viewing is that it required objectivity and confirmation, although all the above examples given were amazingly correct.”
Huh, “all the above examples given were amazingly correct.” So are you trying to discredit my position, or provide evidence that supports it? Because I can’t tell anymore.
Anyway, here's how Ingo Swann compares the transcript of his session, to the subsequent scientific discoveries about Jupiter - pretty interesting: The Ingo Swann 1973 Remote Viewing probe of the planet Jupiter
And here's the drawing he made at the time, which does clearly indicate a proximal ring around Jupiter, which is contrasted with a drawing of Saturn: https://i.pinimg.com/originals/f9/13/a7/f913a71c30151a058393cb95246b8fd2.gif
