PararealitySaint
An Open Minded Skeptic
<!--[if gte mso 9]><xml> <w:WordDocument> <w:View>Normal</w:View> <w:Zoom>0</w:Zoom> <wunctuationKerning/> <w:ValidateAgainstSchemas/> <w:SaveIfXMLInvalid>false</w:SaveIfXMLInvalid> <w:IgnoreMixedContent>false</w:IgnoreMixedContent> <w:AlwaysShowPlaceholderText>false</w:AlwaysShowPlaceholderText> <w:Compatibility> <w:BreakWrappedTables/> <w:SnapToGridInCell/> <w:WrapTextWithPunct/> <w:UseAsianBreakRules/> <wontGrowAutofit/> </w:Compatibility> <w:BrowserLevel>MicrosoftInternetExplorer4</w:BrowserLevel> </w:WordDocument> </xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml> <w:LatentStyles DefLockedState="false" LatentStyleCount="156"> </w:LatentStyles> </xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 10]> <style> /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:"Table Normal"; mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-parent:""; mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt; mso-para-margin:0in; mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:10.0pt; font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-ansi-language:#0400; mso-fareast-language:#0400; mso-bidi-language:#0400;} </style> <![endif]--> Ok, since we seem to have so many different threads pertaining to the same subject, even though the subject matter is out of context to the initial post, I thought it best I begin this thread in the hopes that the arguments for and against E.T. is transferred here.
For those of you whom haven’t been privy to the array of arguments which have been thrown about this forum, shot forth like a wild gunfight in the old west, let me start by pointing out where I believe this subject should go here and be hopefully limited to:
Thanks for taking the time to read this. Whether you agree or disagree about my theory, I am more than open to “honorably” discuss the subject with you. Although I am usually very skeptical about many subjects in this world we share, I do feel pretty adamant about what I have written above. This leaves some of you to conclude that I am no longer skeptical as to the subject. This is untrue. I am a skeptic who needs to find the truth behind what is happening out there. I approach every case as though there are many answers to what is happening, and continue to do so until the “truth be told” one day. The difference is “faith” and “science” are two different bedfellows, and my "Theory" is based solely on faith alone. I do not have any outwardly concrete scientific proof to my theory on other intelligent life, and this leaves my dedication back to where a skeptic should be.... honestly open to all input, but human with a belief nonetheless.
For those of you whom haven’t been privy to the array of arguments which have been thrown about this forum, shot forth like a wild gunfight in the old west, let me start by pointing out where I believe this subject should go here and be hopefully limited to:
- The discussion in this thread should be ONLY on the subject…..Is the sightings and whatever “evidence” from thus enough to believe in or somehow purport dedicating one’s entire position on E.T. as the answer alone.
- Please cease from taking one’s personal religious beliefs (unless you made E.T. your personal religion) and comparing thus to the subject in some form of explanation for why everyone should just believe E.T. is the only answer.
- Can the supposed facts elicited from the phenomena be enough to warrant this as the only conclusion, or are there viable divergent explanations.
- If there are other explanations, what are they and can they stand the test of time.
- I believe E.T. isn’t an E.T. but inter-dimensional in both origin and continuance.
- I believe the Word of God, known as the Bible, clearly explains the phenomenon and that these creatures are Demonic and malevolent.
- I am open to the existence of other life forms in the universe of this dimension, but I do not believe this is what the many victims are experiencing with the abduction phenomenon.
- I do not believe that E.T., and even if there is a such a thing, cares less about humanity. If an intelligence of this level, having to originate from millions of miles away, has the capacity to travel and do what it is he or she or it does, then our meager level of intelligence wouldn’t stand a chance as any interest to them. It would be likened to a scientist observing a small hive of ants, smiling, taking perhaps a few seconds to watch, and then moving on.
- On the other hand, If there was an E.T. interested in us, it wouldn’t hide…it would directly control our lives and do so without the “human” worry of direct involvement or directive. Benevolence and malevolence are human tendencies….In my opinion they wouldn’t stand a chance as an intelligence beyond the measure of our understanding, and wouldn’t see a comparative moral to a level so far below their own. It would be like a human being having a measure of guilt picking his nose because the bacteria in this orifice will now die as it hits the open air. The "picker" would think only of the nasal relief instead of the consequences of the death of that bacterium.
Thanks for taking the time to read this. Whether you agree or disagree about my theory, I am more than open to “honorably” discuss the subject with you. Although I am usually very skeptical about many subjects in this world we share, I do feel pretty adamant about what I have written above. This leaves some of you to conclude that I am no longer skeptical as to the subject. This is untrue. I am a skeptic who needs to find the truth behind what is happening out there. I approach every case as though there are many answers to what is happening, and continue to do so until the “truth be told” one day. The difference is “faith” and “science” are two different bedfellows, and my "Theory" is based solely on faith alone. I do not have any outwardly concrete scientific proof to my theory on other intelligent life, and this leaves my dedication back to where a skeptic should be.... honestly open to all input, but human with a belief nonetheless.