NEW! LOWEST RATES EVER -- SUPPORT THE SHOW AND ENJOY THE VERY BEST PREMIUM PARACAST EXPERIENCE! Welcome to The Paracast+, eight years young! For a low subscription fee, you can download the ad-free version of The Paracast and the exclusive, member-only, After The Paracast bonus podcast, featuring color commentary, exclusive interviews, the continuation of interviews that began on the main episode of The Paracast. We also offer lifetime memberships! Flash! Take advantage of our lowest rates ever! Act now! It's easier than ever to susbcribe! You can sign up right here!

Reply to thread

Message

Jari,

A few obsevations. It is obvious that the the 4th video is available to download as an mp4 (both the short and long version) with a resolution of 480P. In your analysis however, rather than using the video, you chose to use a screen shot to demonstrate camera jiggle. I am curious why you didn't use the actual video footage for your demonstration. Since at the beginning of the short version, lower left hand corner, you can see automobiles traveling on the road, do you deny that this is actual video and not an image being presented? Here it is for your convenience.

[media=youtube]7RF87eEUXmM"[/media]

Also, you suggest you've been "doing this for a long time" and were taught a lot of tricks by "some of the best", can you a bit more forthcoming with any formal training you've had or allow us to judge "some of the best" for ourselves?

I guess for me, for someone to make these claims (I'm not an expert but...) and yet claim the 4th video series posted on youtube is only available as a low res FLV and therefor doesn't present itself for detailed analysis seems oxymoronic if you know what I mean?

The 3rd video is an obvious fake (and was caught out as such from the beginning ) and for you to include it along with your analysis of the other 3 (and make it a major focus) is some what misleading. Kinda like an attempt at guilt by association. It's inclusion weakens your analysis (IMO).

By what standards would you ever consider these video's to be -NOT- in doubt.?

Straighten me out please.

<blockquote data-quote="Jonah" data-source="post: 106627" data-attributes="member: 1729">Jari,A few obsevations. It is obvious that the the 4th video is available to download as an mp4 (both the short and long version) with a resolution of 480P. In your analysis however, rather than using the video, you chose to use a screen shot to demonstrate camera jiggle. I am curious why you didn&#039;t use the actual video footage for your demonstration. Since at the beginning of the short version, lower left hand corner, you can see automobiles traveling on the road, do you deny that this is actual video and not an image being presented? Here it is for your convenience.[media=youtube]7RF87eEUXmM&quot;[/media]Also, you suggest you&#039;ve been &quot;doing this for a long time&quot; and were taught a lot of tricks by &quot;some of the best&quot;, can you a bit more forthcoming with any formal training you&#039;ve had or allow us to judge &quot;some of the best&quot; for ourselves?I guess for me, for someone to make these claims (I&#039;m not an expert but...) and yet claim the 4th video series posted on youtube is only available as a low res FLV and therefor doesn&#039;t present itself for detailed analysis seems oxymoronic if you know what I mean?The 3rd video is an obvious fake (and was caught out as such from the beginning ) and for you to include it along with your analysis of the other 3 (and make it a major focus) is some what misleading. Kinda like an attempt at guilt by association. It&#039;s inclusion weakens your analysis (IMO).By what standards would you ever consider these video&#039;s to be -NOT- in doubt.?Straighten me out please.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Jonah, post: 106627, member: 1729"] Jari, A few obsevations. It is obvious that the the 4th video is available to download as an mp4 (both the short and long version) with a resolution of 480P. In your analysis however, rather than using the video, you chose to use a screen shot to demonstrate camera jiggle. I am curious why you didn't use the actual video footage for your demonstration. Since at the beginning of the short version, lower left hand corner, you can see automobiles traveling on the road, do you deny that this is actual video and not an image being presented? Here it is for your convenience. [media=youtube]7RF87eEUXmM"[/media] Also, you suggest you've been "doing this for a long time" and were taught a lot of tricks by "some of the best", can you a bit more forthcoming with any formal training you've had or allow us to judge "some of the best" for ourselves? I guess for me, for someone to make these claims (I'm not an expert but...) and yet claim the 4th video series posted on youtube is only available as a low res FLV and therefor doesn't present itself for detailed analysis seems oxymoronic if you know what I mean? The 3rd video is an obvious fake (and was caught out as such from the beginning ) and for you to include it along with your analysis of the other 3 (and make it a major focus) is some what misleading. Kinda like an attempt at guilt by association. It's inclusion weakens your analysis (IMO). By what standards would you ever consider these video's to be -NOT- in doubt.? Straighten me out please. [/QUOTE]

Verification