NEW! LOWEST RATES EVER -- SUPPORT THE SHOW AND ENJOY THE VERY BEST PREMIUM PARACAST EXPERIENCE! Welcome to The Paracast+, eight years young! For a low subscription fee, you can download the ad-free version of The Paracast and the exclusive, member-only, After The Paracast bonus podcast, featuring color commentary, exclusive interviews, the continuation of interviews that began on the main episode of The Paracast. We also offer lifetime memberships! Flash! Take advantage of our lowest rates ever! Act now! It's easier than ever to susbcribe! You can sign up right here!

Reply to thread

Message

Alas Softbeard,
I've been doing a lot of investigation over this video...and here's what I've found.

Having spoken with the Israeli Weather Service, I've uncovered what I believe to be a very important piece of information. The weather cam is pointed due NORTH and the field of view does not include the Dome of the Rock and is way too low on the horizon behind Nanalat Shiv'a on the outer edge of the Old City of Jerasulem, and sets nearly due EAST.

They also confirmed that it's the flood lights of the University's community football (soccer) field we see (not the stadium) which is very close to the weather cam. And yes they informed us that it had been a problem several months ago, and occurred quite frequently, forcing them to replace their camera for one with better optics. So they acquired a camera with a better aperture device that recovers and adjusts instantaneously to bright light sources and compensates accordingly; thus it’s no longer a problem. Which is why the mysterious white out only showed up on a SINGLE PARTIAL frame, and not the three, the maker of the video would like us to believe.

I've also seen a counter argument that this does not prove the light was not visible from the weather cam, and the YouTube video's before it, which may have captured the same UFO higher and further behind the Dome (which is why it doesn't reflect off the dome). If that were the case, the size of the UFO and depth perception would make the UFO much larger in the first videos than they appeared, which in all likelihood would have been a lot easier to see by a lot more people considering the size it would have been!

If it had been visible within the Weather Cam's time lapse photos on the far horizon (as pointed out) AND behind the DOME, triangulating the position and size of the UFO would prove, it just wasn't possible.

And oh, just one last point...before I put this issue to bed...I've also spoken with one of my old colleagues at Bosch here in the Netherlands and shown him the stills, as well as an expert video surveillance technician at Bosch...they both confirmed that the stadium lights, that close to this camera, could have caused the problem we see in the still, especially with the cheaper and older models.

Our web pages have been updated with the latest information...
Unanswered Questions - UFO Over Jerusalem
Questioning What Is Probable

Thanks,
Jari

<blockquote data-quote="JMikkola" data-source="post: 106707" data-attributes="member: 3957">Alas Softbeard,I&#039;ve been doing a lot of investigation over this video...and here&#039;s what I&#039;ve found.Having spoken with the Israeli Weather Service, I&#039;ve uncovered what I believe to be a very important piece of information. The weather cam is pointed due NORTH and the field of view does not include the Dome of the Rock and is way too low on the horizon behind Nanalat Shiv&#039;a on the outer edge of the Old City of Jerasulem, and sets nearly due EAST. They also confirmed that it&#039;s the flood lights of the University&#039;s community football (soccer) field we see (not the stadium) which is very close to the weather cam. And yes they informed us that it had been a problem several months ago, and occurred quite frequently, forcing them to replace their camera for one with better optics. So they acquired a camera with a better aperture device that recovers and adjusts instantaneously to bright light sources and compensates accordingly; thus it’s no longer a problem. Which is why the mysterious white out only showed up on a SINGLE PARTIAL frame, and not the three, the maker of the video would like us to believe.I&#039;ve also seen a counter argument that this does not prove the light was not visible from the weather cam, and the YouTube video&#039;s before it, which may have captured the same UFO higher and further behind the Dome (which is why it doesn&#039;t reflect off the dome). If that were the case, the size of the UFO and depth perception would make the UFO much larger in the first videos than they appeared, which in all likelihood would have been a lot easier to see by a lot more people considering the size it would have been!If it had been visible within the Weather Cam&#039;s time lapse photos on the far horizon (as pointed out) AND behind the DOME, triangulating the position and size of the UFO would prove, it just wasn&#039;t possible.And oh, just one last point...before I put this issue to bed...I&#039;ve also spoken with one of my old colleagues at Bosch here in the Netherlands and shown him the stills, as well as an expert video surveillance technician at Bosch...they both confirmed that the stadium lights, that close to this camera, could have caused the problem we see in the still, especially with the cheaper and older models.Our web pages have been updated with the latest information...<a href="http://www.thedimensionzone.com/forensic_video_answering_questions.htm" target="_blank">Unanswered Questions - UFO Over Jerusalem</a><a href="http://www.thedimensionzone.com/forensic_probablility.htm" target="_blank">Questioning What Is Probable</a>Thanks,Jari</blockquote>

[QUOTE="JMikkola, post: 106707, member: 3957"] Alas Softbeard, I've been doing a lot of investigation over this video...and here's what I've found. Having spoken with the Israeli Weather Service, I've uncovered what I believe to be a very important piece of information. The weather cam is pointed due NORTH and the field of view does not include the Dome of the Rock and is way too low on the horizon behind Nanalat Shiv'a on the outer edge of the Old City of Jerasulem, and sets nearly due EAST. They also confirmed that it's the flood lights of the University's community football (soccer) field we see (not the stadium) which is very close to the weather cam. And yes they informed us that it had been a problem several months ago, and occurred quite frequently, forcing them to replace their camera for one with better optics. So they acquired a camera with a better aperture device that recovers and adjusts instantaneously to bright light sources and compensates accordingly; thus it’s no longer a problem. Which is why the mysterious white out only showed up on a SINGLE PARTIAL frame, and not the three, the maker of the video would like us to believe. I've also seen a counter argument that this does not prove the light was not visible from the weather cam, and the YouTube video's before it, which may have captured the same UFO higher and further behind the Dome (which is why it doesn't reflect off the dome). If that were the case, the size of the UFO and depth perception would make the UFO much larger in the first videos than they appeared, which in all likelihood would have been a lot easier to see by a lot more people considering the size it would have been! If it had been visible within the Weather Cam's time lapse photos on the far horizon (as pointed out) AND behind the DOME, triangulating the position and size of the UFO would prove, it just wasn't possible. And oh, just one last point...before I put this issue to bed...I've also spoken with one of my old colleagues at Bosch here in the Netherlands and shown him the stills, as well as an expert video surveillance technician at Bosch...they both confirmed that the stadium lights, that close to this camera, could have caused the problem we see in the still, especially with the cheaper and older models. Our web pages have been updated with the latest information... [url="http://www.thedimensionzone.com/forensic_video_answering_questions.htm"]Unanswered Questions - UFO Over Jerusalem[/url] [url="http://www.thedimensionzone.com/forensic_probablility.htm"]Questioning What Is Probable[/url] Thanks, Jari [/QUOTE]

Verification