-
NEW! LOWEST RATES EVER -- SUPPORT THE SHOW AND ENJOY THE VERY BEST PREMIUM PARACAST EXPERIENCE! Welcome to The Paracast+, eight years young! For a low subscription fee, you can download the ad-free version of The Paracast and the exclusive, member-only, After The Paracast bonus podcast, featuring color commentary, exclusive interviews, the continuation of interviews that began on the main episode of The Paracast. We also offer lifetime memberships! Flash! Take advantage of our lowest rates ever! Act now! It's easier than ever to susbcribe! You can sign up right here!
UFO Shoots Beam Video----Argentina
- Thread starter Zandroid
- Start date
Free episodes:
Zandroid
Skilled Investigator
You may not like UFO Digest I have problems with it
But here Look
Scott Corralles posted a story on UFO Digest for you to check out
UFO Fires Beams Over Alto Rosario, Argentina Again!
But here Look
Scott Corralles posted a story on UFO Digest for you to check out
UFO Fires Beams Over Alto Rosario, Argentina Again!
Gareth
Nothin' to see here
Interesting. How long has this 'flap' been going on in Argentina? A couple years now right? If it turns out that traffic lights and phones really did malfunction due to some electro magnetic interference it will add a fascinating new piece of corroboration for the case.
Zandroid
Skilled Investigator
David and Gene:
Can you ask Mr. Corralles a question for me ( a long time Paracast listener) like every episode.
Can you ask:
1. What is in the area that the beam is water, field, forest? etc is a mountain there when its light?
2. Has anyone analyzed it to determine its authenticity?
Can you ask Mr. Corralles a question for me ( a long time Paracast listener) like every episode.
Can you ask:
1. What is in the area that the beam is water, field, forest? etc is a mountain there when its light?
2. Has anyone analyzed it to determine its authenticity?
David Biedny
Paranormal Adept
So how many threads do we need on this? Zandroid, would you mind if I delete one of these threads?
And yes, we talk about this with Scott, personally, that video looks a bit tampered with to me. I'm not impressed with it.
dB
I watched this over and over and I do believe this is some sort of hoax. I don't believe it was intended to be a hoax at the time it was shot. It looks to me that somebody is taping a celestial object. Maybe after it had not moved for an hour the person realized it was a celestial object and decided to "butter" it up a little? Or maybe somebody else got a hold of it.
As far as the actual beam... one thing I noticed is it is too clean for the video. If you notice at the beginning of the video is the front of a house and a tree. Look how blurry that is. It's all smudgy and the color is strange on top of it. If it is night vision and not some filter to make it look like night vision then that makes it even harder to explain the clean line in the video using night vision. Everything else is fuzzy except this perfect line? So maybe it is a laser of some type and is very defined but just seems a little too clean to me. Something about the still looks funny to me also. The edge of the light seems to cut off slight to the right of the beam. Almost like the beam was layered on top of the light source. The color seems to blend in the beam from the light source. It all just looks funny to me.
It is not hard to match the vibrations of such a defined point in the video. I have had experience because I went to film school. It's helped me spot a fake. This video I can't say for certain is but all I can say what my gut says from the clues given and it says this is an added element to the video.
As far as the actual beam... one thing I noticed is it is too clean for the video. If you notice at the beginning of the video is the front of a house and a tree. Look how blurry that is. It's all smudgy and the color is strange on top of it. If it is night vision and not some filter to make it look like night vision then that makes it even harder to explain the clean line in the video using night vision. Everything else is fuzzy except this perfect line? So maybe it is a laser of some type and is very defined but just seems a little too clean to me. Something about the still looks funny to me also. The edge of the light seems to cut off slight to the right of the beam. Almost like the beam was layered on top of the light source. The color seems to blend in the beam from the light source. It all just looks funny to me.
It is not hard to match the vibrations of such a defined point in the video. I have had experience because I went to film school. It's helped me spot a fake. This video I can't say for certain is but all I can say what my gut says from the clues given and it says this is an added element to the video.
CarnbY
Paranormal Novice
I just wanted to chime in and say that the beam looks "fake" to me as well. I thought maybe it could be some kind of technical glitch in the camera phone... Kinda like when you point a digital against the sun, and it overexposes so much it becomes a black spot?
I read through it all a couple of days ago, can't remember if the witnesses actually saw the beam or whether it was only visible in the video? Either way, looking forward to the episode!
I read through it all a couple of days ago, can't remember if the witnesses actually saw the beam or whether it was only visible in the video? Either way, looking forward to the episode!
Looks very fake and likely done in Photoshop.
Is it a coincidence that the beam only appears in the frames where the camera isn't moving? The sharpness of the beam does't match the fuzzyness of the UFO in terms of atmospheric blur.
Is is a coincidence that with all the movement the camera is held at a perfect vertical and the beam is perfectly vertical at the same time? In almost every situation a camera is held at a slight angle off the vertical. In this case even a perfect vertical beam would have some blurring from the camera CCD trying to image the line. We see none of this.
Even more telling - why does no one react when the UFO shoots a beam of light? With all the people watching not one person gets excited about the UFO doing something extremely rare.
Is it a coincidence that the beam only appears in the frames where the camera isn't moving? The sharpness of the beam does't match the fuzzyness of the UFO in terms of atmospheric blur.
Is is a coincidence that with all the movement the camera is held at a perfect vertical and the beam is perfectly vertical at the same time? In almost every situation a camera is held at a slight angle off the vertical. In this case even a perfect vertical beam would have some blurring from the camera CCD trying to image the line. We see none of this.
Even more telling - why does no one react when the UFO shoots a beam of light? With all the people watching not one person gets excited about the UFO doing something extremely rare.
