NEW! LOWEST RATES EVER -- SUPPORT THE SHOW AND ENJOY THE VERY BEST PREMIUM PARACAST EXPERIENCE! Welcome to The Paracast+, eight years young! For a low subscription fee, you can download the ad-free version of The Paracast and the exclusive, member-only, After The Paracast bonus podcast, featuring color commentary, exclusive interviews, the continuation of interviews that began on the main episode of The Paracast. We also offer lifetime memberships! Flash! Take advantage of our lowest rates ever! Act now! It's easier than ever to susbcribe! You can sign up right here!

Reply to thread

Message

I respectfully disagree on both counts. Polls show a very high interest in UFOs by the general public. I think a Gallup Poll was done a few years ago that revealed that nearly 80% of those interviewed believe that UFO are real. Serious people do study them, you just aren't familiar with the work.
As for your comment about science, there is plenty of good science that is and can be done on this topic. The foundations of which might be found in looking at Hessdalen, Norway and the evolution of inquiry that began as eyewitness reports of UAP and led to instrumented studies and even more inquiries... Review the papers at http://www.hessdalen.org and then go to http://www.itacomm.net for more research....Check out CIPH, Google Massimo Teodorani and Renzo Cabassi for more examples of science applied effectively to UAP research. And don't forget to get current with the work by the official UAP research teams of the world like CEFAA and GEIPAN-CNES... Science has all the tools necessary to resolve this matter. Its a matter of building from foundation to advanced research. Right now we are closer to the foundational work...

I think the big problem in UFOlogy today is its ignorance about current research and its insistence on clinging to mantras like "Science doesn't care" rather than actually finding out what is being done....

<blockquote data-quote="Ted Roe" data-source="post: 95904" data-attributes="member: 2711">I respectfully disagree on both counts. Polls show a very high interest in UFOs by the general public. I think a Gallup Poll was done a few years ago that revealed that nearly 80% of those interviewed believe that UFO are real. Serious people do study them, you just aren&#039;t familiar with the work.As for your comment about science, there is plenty of good science that is and can be done on this topic. The foundations of which might be found in looking at Hessdalen, Norway and the evolution of inquiry that began as eyewitness reports of UAP and led to instrumented studies and even more inquiries...&nbsp; Review the papers at <a href="http://www.hessdalen.org" target="_blank">http://www.hessdalen.org</a> and then go to <a href="http://www.itacomm.net" target="_blank">http://www.itacomm.net</a> for more research....Check out CIPH,&nbsp; Google Massimo Teodorani and Renzo Cabassi for more examples of science applied effectively to UAP research. And don&#039;t forget to get current with the work by the official UAP research teams of the world like CEFAA and GEIPAN-CNES... Science has all the tools necessary to resolve this matter. Its a matter of building from foundation to advanced research. Right now we are closer to the foundational work...I think the big problem in UFOlogy today is its ignorance about current research and its insistence on clinging to mantras like &quot;Science doesn&#039;t care&quot; rather than actually finding out what is being done....</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Ted Roe, post: 95904, member: 2711"] I respectfully disagree on both counts. Polls show a very high interest in UFOs by the general public. I think a Gallup Poll was done a few years ago that revealed that nearly 80% of those interviewed believe that UFO are real. Serious people do study them, you just aren't familiar with the work. As for your comment about science, there is plenty of good science that is and can be done on this topic. The foundations of which might be found in looking at Hessdalen, Norway and the evolution of inquiry that began as eyewitness reports of UAP and led to instrumented studies and even more inquiries... Review the papers at [url="http://www.hessdalen.org"]http://www.hessdalen.org[/url] and then go to [url="http://www.itacomm.net"]http://www.itacomm.net[/url] for more research....Check out CIPH, Google Massimo Teodorani and Renzo Cabassi for more examples of science applied effectively to UAP research. And don't forget to get current with the work by the official UAP research teams of the world like CEFAA and GEIPAN-CNES... Science has all the tools necessary to resolve this matter. Its a matter of building from foundation to advanced research. Right now we are closer to the foundational work... I think the big problem in UFOlogy today is its ignorance about current research and its insistence on clinging to mantras like "Science doesn't care" rather than actually finding out what is being done.... [/QUOTE]

Verification