Being somewhat of an anarchist myself, I share your sentiment on government. But at the same time, if anarchy is the freedom of individuals to choose to do as they please, and it pleases a number of individuals to form a government, then it seems to me that the result is a paradox whereby all is anarchy, including government.
This situation results in a tension between individuality and conformity, the key to harmony being an appropriate balance between what is objectively speaking, better managed by governments than individuals. During times of pressure there is more friction on the points of contention. That heats things up, and any system can only stand so much heat before it becomes unstable.
At present, we're able to withstand the pressure because there is a certain amount of social responsibility that both individuals and governments realize can help to resolve a common situation. However as you rightly point out, the situation also creates opportunities for factions to expand their influence or agendas. Perhaps what we ought to consider is that this situation applies to everyone.
That means there is an opportunity for all sides to gain ground, and it's not a foregone conclusion that any one of them has to do so at the expense of the others. There is a third option that can leave us all better off, and it starts with not seeing everyone else as the enemy. If good people everywhere can work together, a win-win solution is possible.
I'm trying to maintain that heading, and part of that effort includes relaying that third option. If groups and individuals on all sides recognize it, then this crisis can be seen as an opportunity to turn negatives into positives. The questions are, how do we spread that message, and how do we engage the situation on that level?