• NEW! LOWEST RATES EVER -- SUPPORT THE SHOW AND ENJOY THE VERY BEST PREMIUM PARACAST EXPERIENCE! Welcome to The Paracast+, eight years young! For a low subscription fee, you can download the ad-free version of The Paracast and the exclusive, member-only, After The Paracast bonus podcast, featuring color commentary, exclusive interviews, the continuation of interviews that began on the main episode of The Paracast. We also offer lifetime memberships! Flash! Take advantage of our lowest rates ever! Act now! It's easier than ever to susbcribe! You can sign up right here!

    Subscribe to The Paracast Newsletter!

What are your Thoughts on this UFO METALLIC VIDEO

Forums New posts

Free episodes:

I was going to post when I saw that you did alwready... Well it's looks good, it looks like people that where filming something... But with these kind of shots, you don't really know what they are filming.... At night well you have to take their word about what they are filming and during the day, there so much haze that it could be light on the other side of the passage, we don't know exactly where they are filming towards.... it's very interesting...

Also I think I saw something like this before,around 2 years ago, I don't think it's his first video of that object he's taking....

Still, interesting video... Hope he gets better stuff....

Ghis
 
I'm not a debunker. I would like to find out what these things are. But this video is both unimpressive and likely a hoax (at least the metallic thing). And here is why:

Anytime I see a video with no beginning of the sighting and no end, it sends off red flags. At one point they say "it has disappeared or left". This is while they are zooming out (disappearing UFO). Also there is no foreground with the metallic thing. Just a closeup of the "craft". To me it looks like they are zooming into something very close to them, pretending that it is apparently in the air. Where are the reference points??

The video also shows lights in the sky. They don't even seem anomolous, just lights across the water, or up in the sky. This is mixed with the metallic "craft", like that craft is supposed to be the lights before?? I don't know. There seem to be multiple problems with this video. Just my opinion.

I could go on, but for me it is easy: Next please.
 
this is more than one video. looks at the dates, they are all shot around the same time, but at different times. This might be explained in the text, i havent had time to read any of it
 
The question I have about the metallic object is the bottom of it. It looks like it could be something behind something else making it appear a saucer.

Please continue discussion on this I want to get some things you dont like and things you find anomolous.
 
Well, the article talks about the occupants being clearly visable. I guess I missed that part. To be honest, it doesnt look like it is moving at all. only the camera motion. Like anyone here there are big red flags with no beginning or ending to the sighting, night time with no ground reference, and no steady tripod shot. The article talks about the video being 2 1/2 hours long. As if thats alone is not the credability kiss of death, read this tasty gem.

"We, as Sirius UFO Space Science Research Center firstly, spoke with all the witnesses separetly then did the detailed analysis of the full footage of 2 hours 30 mn. long videos with the participation of our members of science board... We have enlarged the video images of the footages, did all the detailed analysis and checked their pixels and went through the all footage frame by frame. After doing all the necessary analysis which went on for several weeks, we came to a definite conclusion with no doubts that these are “100% genuine footages”!... "

Beware the 100% guarantee, it usually means 100% BS! Let them release the full length video and then maybe ask the scientists to produce some complex analysis of the footage and I might change my mind, but until then...BS Basket.
 
This is crap.

The object in the sharp video doesn't ever appear to move in any direction or rotate in any axis beyond movement of the hand held camera view.

At one point the voice says there is fog but the video shows no atmospheric distortion what so ever. Seems like it was shooting a small model held just a few yards away. I've never seen a night time video with such sharp focus on an object far away.

The lighting is all wrong and doesn't match the position of the moon relative to the highlights. Plus the highlights don't move either suggesting the object is not moving despite what the narrator says. Any other lighting exhibited on the underside or opposite side of the object from the moon does not appear to be self illuminated but appears exacly like someone would have lit in a studio or 3D modeling program to specifically outline the shape of the object.

I suspect a miniature on the sharp images only because there is no self illumination which would require a more sophisticated model with lights and wiring. I don't think these amateurs went to that length. If it was a 3D model is would be easier to create a glow effect and make it move convincingly.

All these videos could easily be done with static photoshop images composited to a hand held video.

Also notice the sound throughout seems to be too consistent for it have been recorded at different times. That is in a normal video compilation the sound levels usually are different with various levels and different background ambient sounds. Listen to the video and the voice as well as background noise sounds too even. This smacks of a studio done soundtrack.
 
Back
Top