Reply to thread

For the record here, I firmly believe that a lot of the phenomena discussed here does exist as something real that goes beyond the mundane and in some cases represents technology or abilities that are not understood by the science of our time. The reason I seem skeptical is because I want to know the truth about these phenomena and in the absence of scientific verification, the process of critical thinking is the best tool we have to discern what is the most reasonable explanation. It's not identical to skepticism, but like skepticism it forces us to question our assumptions and theories to the extent that it is possible given the information we have to work with. It is essential that we apply this process to our understanding of these phenomena if we are to have any credibility. When used in the context of healthy inquiry, it can also be intellectually stimulating, which many people also find enjoyable. 

 

Unfortunately because it is similar to skepticism, and because skeptics have gained a less than stellar reputation for sensitivity, there are times when the use of critical thinking can open old wounds. There are also times when it may cause discomfort for those who are heavily invested in a particular belief or are prone to making fabrications. Often it's not easy to discern why someone gets upset at being questioned about their beliefs or statements. But regardless, the intent should never be to demean or be rude or hurtful. I've suggested that we should use a little more discretion here sometimes. Of course I'm not perfect myself either, but this is just my opinion. Last but not least, the tone of the forum is set by those who participate, and it's good to see someone with your attitude stepping back in. If you want to see more of the stuff you like, pick some topics and a direction. Become part of the solution you would like to see  .