• NEW! LOWEST RATES EVER -- SUPPORT THE SHOW AND ENJOY THE VERY BEST PREMIUM PARACAST EXPERIENCE! Welcome to The Paracast+, eight years young! For a low subscription fee, you can download the ad-free version of The Paracast and the exclusive, member-only, After The Paracast bonus podcast, featuring color commentary, exclusive interviews, the continuation of interviews that began on the main episode of The Paracast. We also offer lifetime memberships! Flash! Take advantage of our lowest rates ever! Act now! It's easier than ever to susbcribe! You can sign up right here!

    Subscribe to The Paracast Newsletter!

Reply to thread

I certainly think the term is tossed around loosely.  No, the title certainly does not require a PhD.   I would classify a scientist as someone who is professionally trained  and/or educated to use the scientific method in a particular field of  study.  However, there are certainly exceptions to the definition.


There  is nothing wrong with being religious and a scientist, many religious  people have contributed to science and some would argue the two go hand  in hand.  However, when you believe the earth is 6,000 years old and  still claim to be a geologist then you are ignoring scientific fact and  should not be considered a scientist.  Also, a biologist who does not believe in evolution might as well be a physicist that ignores the theory of gravity.


Back
Top