• NEW! LOWEST RATES EVER -- SUPPORT THE SHOW AND ENJOY THE VERY BEST PREMIUM PARACAST EXPERIENCE! Welcome to The Paracast+, eight years young! For a low subscription fee, you can download the ad-free version of The Paracast and the exclusive, member-only, After The Paracast bonus podcast, featuring color commentary, exclusive interviews, the continuation of interviews that began on the main episode of The Paracast. We also offer lifetime memberships! Flash! Take advantage of our lowest rates ever! Act now! It's easier than ever to susbcribe! You can sign up right here!

    Subscribe to The Paracast Newsletter!

Reply to thread

I don't know what the final definition of a "scientist" is, although there are some good posts on here about it.


I consider myself an "amateur scientist".

I love the stars, I'm frequently out on clear nights with either my telescope, or my binoculars hunting for comets or anything unusual. I have a number to call if I find something,  but going on 30 years now of observations, and I haven't yet.....I stress yet. I WILL find a comet that will, at least partially, have my name on it.

I have a computer monitored weather station with a UV meter and a recently upgraded atmospheric Geiger counter. I also have a magnetometer that keeps track of the local geomagnetic field - it's cool for when Earth gets hit by a coronal mass ejection or just a lot of solar wind to watch how much the mag field gets deflected.

And some other scientific equipment (microscopes, and what not).


So AM I a scientist? Well, I don't get paid to monitor this stuff, I do it for the sheer fascination I have with the universe around me. But using monetary gain as a guide is wrong I guess.

I'm just happy with my amateur status.


Back
Top