NEW! LOWEST RATES EVER -- SUPPORT THE SHOW AND ENJOY THE VERY BEST PREMIUM PARACAST EXPERIENCE! Welcome to The Paracast+, eight years young! For a low subscription fee, you can download the ad-free version of The Paracast and the exclusive, member-only, After The Paracast bonus podcast, featuring color commentary, exclusive interviews, the continuation of interviews that began on the main episode of The Paracast. We also offer lifetime memberships! Flash! Take advantage of our lowest rates ever! Act now! It's easier than ever to susbcribe! You can sign up right here!

Reply to thread

Message

Your point escapes me. I believe it is a valid argument. It shows the progression of the very branch of science you have brought up in identifying a particular type of UFO.

No, I don't think so. You have "identified" the objects as non-human technology. I believe that is an error on your part. Therefore you are not talking about UNIDENTIFED Flying Objects or UNIDENTIFED Aerial Phenomena. You are talking about the ETH. That is something else entirely.

It seems to me that you are asking Why don't astronomers report seeing Extra-terrestrial craft? I think the answer is another question, "How could they tell?"

Check out the following links about real UFOs.

See NARCAP

See Project Hessdalen

---------- Post added at 11:23 AM ---------- Previous post was at 11:16 AM ----------

Why don't astronomers report sighting the plethora of UAVs and other "secret" aircraft that the military has in constant development?

<blockquote data-quote="trainedobserver" data-source="post: 97601" data-attributes="member: 2192">Your point escapes me. I believe it is a valid argument. It shows the progression of the very branch of science you have brought up in identifying a particular type of UFO. &nbsp;&nbsp;No, I don&#039;t think so. You have &quot;identified&quot; the objects as non-human technology. I believe that is an error on your part. Therefore you are not talking about UNIDENTIFED Flying Objects or UNIDENTIFED Aerial Phenomena. You are talking about the ETH. That is something else entirely.It seems to me that you are asking Why don&#039;t astronomers report seeing Extra-terrestrial craft? I think the answer is another question, &quot;How could they tell?&quot;Check out the following links about real UFOs. See <a href="http://www.narcap.org/" target="_blank">NARCAP</a>See <a href="http://www.hessdalen.org/index_e.shtml" target="_blank">Project Hessdalen</a>---------- Post added at 11:23 AM ---------- Previous post was at 11:16 AM ----------Why don&#039;t astronomers report sighting the plethora of UAVs and other &quot;secret&quot; aircraft that the military has in constant development?</blockquote>

[QUOTE="trainedobserver, post: 97601, member: 2192"] Your point escapes me. I believe it is a valid argument. It shows the progression of the very branch of science you have brought up in identifying a particular type of UFO. No, I don't think so. You have "identified" the objects as non-human technology. I believe that is an error on your part. Therefore you are not talking about UNIDENTIFED Flying Objects or UNIDENTIFED Aerial Phenomena. You are talking about the ETH. That is something else entirely. It seems to me that you are asking Why don't astronomers report seeing Extra-terrestrial craft? I think the answer is another question, "How could they tell?" Check out the following links about real UFOs. See [URL="http://www.narcap.org/"]NARCAP[/URL] See [URL="http://www.hessdalen.org/index_e.shtml"]Project Hessdalen[/URL][COLOR="Silver"] [SIZE=1]---------- Post added at 11:23 AM ---------- Previous post was at 11:16 AM ----------[/SIZE] [/COLOR]Why don't astronomers report sighting the plethora of UAVs and other "secret" aircraft that the military has in constant development? [/QUOTE]

Verification