NEW! LOWEST RATES EVER -- SUPPORT THE SHOW AND ENJOY THE VERY BEST PREMIUM PARACAST EXPERIENCE! Welcome to The Paracast+, eight years young! For a low subscription fee, you can download the ad-free version of The Paracast and the exclusive, member-only, After The Paracast bonus podcast, featuring color commentary, exclusive interviews, the continuation of interviews that began on the main episode of The Paracast. We also offer lifetime memberships! Flash! Take advantage of our lowest rates ever! Act now! It's easier than ever to susbcribe! You can sign up right here!

Reply to thread

Message

I used "psychological" as an example, but it can be any other mundane, more ordinary explanation. Maybe it was a mistake for me to let my feelings about this be known, as I will be forever be labeled as a closed minded skeptic. However, I'm not closed to the idea that there are things going on that we don't fully understand or that we haven't discovered.
If you described how we were having this discussion one hundred years ago to someone you would have been thought of as mad. The thing is that we can't just believe that there are non-human beings messing with us without absolute proof. People are extremely unreliable sources when it comes to describing they see.
Whose to say that all the UFOs that are seen are not advanced human technology? Why does it have to be alien? That's all I'm getting at here. I guess we can't all agree on this stuff right?
It's a lot like discussing religion, everyone has different beliefs, or non-beliefs.

---------- Post added at 09:31 PM ---------- Previous post was at 09:28 PM ----------

The thing is, these are claims. There's no real proof, is there, otherwise scientists would take these claims a little more seriously.
It's a lot like all those psychics that claim to have powers, every time they're put to the test they fall flat on their face.

<blockquote data-quote="Angel of Ioren" data-source="post: 87730" data-attributes="member: 1395">I used &quot;psychological&quot; as an example, but it can be any other mundane, more ordinary explanation. Maybe it was a mistake for me to let my feelings about this be known, as I will be forever be labeled as a closed minded skeptic. However, I&#039;m not closed to the idea that there are things going on that we don&#039;t fully understand or that we haven&#039;t discovered. If you described how we were having this discussion one hundred years ago to someone you would have been thought of as mad. The thing is that we can&#039;t just believe that there are non-human beings messing with us without absolute proof. People are extremely unreliable sources when it comes to describing they see.Whose to say that all the UFOs that are seen are not advanced human technology? Why does it have to be alien? That&#039;s all I&#039;m getting at here. I guess we can&#039;t all agree on this stuff right?It&#039;s a lot like discussing religion, everyone has different beliefs, or non-beliefs.---------- Post added at 09:31 PM ---------- Previous post was at 09:28 PM ----------&nbsp;The thing is, these are claims. There&#039;s no real proof, is there, otherwise scientists would take these claims a little more seriously. It&#039;s a lot like all those psychics that claim to have powers, every time they&#039;re put to the test they fall flat on their face.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Angel of Ioren, post: 87730, member: 1395"] I used "psychological" as an example, but it can be any other mundane, more ordinary explanation. Maybe it was a mistake for me to let my feelings about this be known, as I will be forever be labeled as a closed minded skeptic. However, I'm not closed to the idea that there are things going on that we don't fully understand or that we haven't discovered. If you described how we were having this discussion one hundred years ago to someone you would have been thought of as mad. The thing is that we can't just believe that there are non-human beings messing with us without absolute proof. People are extremely unreliable sources when it comes to describing they see. Whose to say that all the UFOs that are seen are not advanced human technology? Why does it have to be alien? That's all I'm getting at here. I guess we can't all agree on this stuff right? It's a lot like discussing religion, everyone has different beliefs, or non-beliefs.[COLOR="Silver"] [SIZE=1]---------- Post added at 09:31 PM ---------- Previous post was at 09:28 PM ----------[/SIZE] [/COLOR] The thing is, these are claims. There's no real proof, is there, otherwise scientists would take these claims a little more seriously. It's a lot like all those psychics that claim to have powers, every time they're put to the test they fall flat on their face. [/QUOTE]

Verification