• NEW! LOWEST RATES EVER -- SUPPORT THE SHOW AND ENJOY THE VERY BEST PREMIUM PARACAST EXPERIENCE! Welcome to The Paracast+, eight years young! For a low subscription fee, you can download the ad-free version of The Paracast and the exclusive, member-only, After The Paracast bonus podcast, featuring color commentary, exclusive interviews, the continuation of interviews that began on the main episode of The Paracast. We also offer lifetime memberships! Flash! Take advantage of our lowest rates ever! Act now! It's easier than ever to susbcribe! You can sign up right here!

    Subscribe to The Paracast Newsletter!

Why is NASA editing these Images?

Free episodes:

rohnds

Skilled Investigator
Read this excellent article.
http://xenotechresearch.com/NASAHACK.htm

I did my own investigation into the photo in question (in the article).

The photo in question was take using L7 camera has time stamp of 143098049. And the one taken by R1 has a time stamp of 143098049. We have 2 photos with identical time stamp but the photos are different. L and R is one camera and thus should be pointing at the same altitude. But one show different rock line.

On the PANCAM there are lenses or eyes. Left one is L and the right one is R. The number following is the filter used. NASA then used the 2 images to create a composite and better resolution, depth and clarity.
The fact that both have the same time means that one was taken by the left and other by the right as the same time.

Rohn
 
well done rohnds!

DB and Gene will probably say you are crazy and that NASA never alters images from space. Even DB cannot refute the poor image editing done on these images.
 
RonCollins dont hold your breath on a reply from David. he has made it very clear from a photoshop expert standpoint that NASA photos of the moon and on the moon are genuine. on the other hand as a user of photoshop for just as long as David, i say BS.
 
pixelsmith said:
RonCollins dont hold your breath on a reply from David. he has made it very clear from a photoshop expert standpoint that NASA photos of the moon and on the moon are genuine. on the other hand as a user of photoshop for just as long as David, i say BS.

You know these are photos of Mars right?
 
sorry, no coffee yet. i stand corrected. apologies to David.
that said, if NASA edits MARS photos you can be sure they edit MOON photos.
 
I would still really like to get his "official opinion" on this one. It seems pretty cut and dried that something anomalous has occurred here. If not, I would like to hear the explanation of why they are not. Perhaps an item by item explanation of why this guy is wrong.

The second page is quite fascinating. It certainly does look like a plume. The dark spots in the air look to me like rocks just as the site claims. Clearly, I am no image specialist...but it does look compelling. I wonder what possible gain NASA would see for hiding a thermal venting in process. Depending on the news day, it may or may not make the headlines. Even if it did, it is not like it would send shockwaves throughout the world. Just seems an odd thing to hide.
 
Interesting post. Thanks for that. Very intriguing picture with the two "rocks" flung into the air. I can't imagine why a JPL scientist would want to hide something like an active geyser on Mars though....
 
Maybe because once other Countries find out there is more to Mars and the Moon than we have been told, they will all start sending probes there and staking their claims.

Maybe this is some thing NASA does not want?

NASA ( Never A Straight Answer )
 
Before everyone gets their panties in a twist I suggest you all take a look at the full color panoramic of the Mars crater Endurance here:

: A Crater of Clues to Mars Buried Past

The area in question is just left of top center. Don't forget to use the zoom function.
As best I can tell the rim of the crater has not been edited out. Could it be that some false edges were created on some of the images in order to more easily merge images together to create the panoramic view?
 
Maybe because once other Countries find out there is more to Mars and the Moon than we have been told, they will all start sending probes there and staking their claims.

Maybe this is some thing NASA does not want?

NASA ( Never A Straight Answer )

LOL @ "NASA ( Never A Straight Answer )"

Its a fair point! though if the claims of Moon bases that arent ours were to ever be validated, i wouldnt want too try and stake my claim...maybe just send a nice hamper and some Knicks tickets.
Maybe we werent welcome back?
 
LOL @ "NASA ( Never A Straight Answer )"

Its a fair point! though if the claims of Moon bases that arent ours were to ever be validated, i wouldnt want too try and stake my claim...maybe just send a nice hamper and some Knicks tickets.
Maybe we werent welcome back?


Get in quick, you can buy land on the Moon, Mars and Venus right now! ( lol ) http://www.moonestates.com/

---------- Post added at 06:07 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:05 PM ----------

That is pretty good. If I am not mistaken, the (in)famous Richard C. Hoagland coined that phrase. He is the first one I remember saying it.

Yup, you are correct my friend.... Although he's gone all Multi Dimentional Hyper Triangle or something now , :)
 
Back
Top