NEW! LOWEST RATES EVER -- SUPPORT THE SHOW AND ENJOY THE VERY BEST PREMIUM PARACAST EXPERIENCE! Welcome to The Paracast+, eight years young! For a low subscription fee, you can download the ad-free version of The Paracast and the exclusive, member-only, After The Paracast bonus podcast, featuring color commentary, exclusive interviews, the continuation of interviews that began on the main episode of The Paracast. We also offer lifetime memberships! Flash! Take advantage of our lowest rates ever! Act now! It's easier than ever to susbcribe! You can sign up right here!

Reply to thread

Message

Your question about what is the “best” form of knowledge is right out of the Richard Dawkins book. This is like asking “which is better, a humming bird, or a basket ball”. The two have no relation to each other. Science does nothing to answer questions on ethics. Science can just as easily build a military virus, or a vaccine. They can just as easily build an atomic bomb, or a nuclear power plant. Religion and ethics is what gives humans the questions of right or wrong, and it has nothing to do with the data gathering of science. I believe in a conscience universe, (or “God” if you will), this has no effect on my science.
<?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-comfficeffice" /><o> </o>

<blockquote data-quote="plumbbob12" data-source="post: 107908" data-attributes="member: 3278">Your question about what is the “best” form of knowledge is right out of the Richard Dawkins book. This is like asking “which is better, a humming bird, or a basket ball”.&nbsp; The two have no relation to each other. Science does nothing to answer questions on ethics. Science can just as easily build a military virus, or a vaccine. They can just as easily build an atomic bomb, or a nuclear power plant.&nbsp; Religion and ethics is what gives humans the questions of right or wrong, and it has nothing to do with the data gathering of science.&nbsp; I believe in a conscience universe, (or “God” if you will), this has no effect on my science.&lt;?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = &quot;urn:schemas-microsoft-com<img src="/forum/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/eek.png"&nbsp; class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":o" title="Eek!&nbsp; &nbsp; :o" data-shortname=":o" />ffice<img src="/forum/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/eek.png"&nbsp; class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":o" title="Eek!&nbsp; &nbsp; :o" data-shortname=":o" />ffice&quot; /&gt;&lt;o<img src="/forum/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/tongue.png"&nbsp; class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":p" title="Stick Out Tongue&nbsp; &nbsp; :p" data-shortname=":p" />&gt; &lt;/o<img src="/forum/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/tongue.png"&nbsp; class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":p" title="Stick Out Tongue&nbsp; &nbsp; :p" data-shortname=":p" />&gt;</blockquote>

[QUOTE="plumbbob12, post: 107908, member: 3278"] Your question about what is the “best” form of knowledge is right out of the Richard Dawkins book. This is like asking “which is better, a humming bird, or a basket ball”. The two have no relation to each other. Science does nothing to answer questions on ethics. Science can just as easily build a military virus, or a vaccine. They can just as easily build an atomic bomb, or a nuclear power plant. Religion and ethics is what gives humans the questions of right or wrong, and it has nothing to do with the data gathering of science. I believe in a conscience universe, (or “God” if you will), this has no effect on my science. <?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" /><o:p>[FONT=Calibri] [/FONT]</o:p> [/QUOTE]

Verification