• NEW! LOWEST RATES EVER -- SUPPORT THE SHOW AND ENJOY THE VERY BEST PREMIUM PARACAST EXPERIENCE! Welcome to The Paracast+, eight years young! For a low subscription fee, you can download the ad-free version of The Paracast and the exclusive, member-only, After The Paracast bonus podcast, featuring color commentary, exclusive interviews, the continuation of interviews that began on the main episode of The Paracast. We also offer lifetime memberships! Flash! Take advantage of our lowest rates ever! Act now! It's easier than ever to susbcribe! You can sign up right here!

    Subscribe to The Paracast Newsletter!

Why they are here...

Free episodes:

Seer/Sucker

Paranormal Novice
3031409354_2c9a39725b.jpg
 
enculturation, now theres a word

out of interest, if we could "give" this species the genes for speech artificially should we do it ?.

is there a difference between that and the "enculturation" these subjects were "given" ?

Interesting question.
I think we should avoid interfering with their evolution, for a number of reasons:
1) Modifying another species implies that we "own" them in some way, since we're assuming the right to change their nature to suit our purposes and perceptions.
2) We would stuff it up the way we usually do when we modify a complex system that we don't really understand. Genetics is actually a lot like knitting, except to the extent that it isn't (but you know what happens when you pull on one bit of wool...)

I do believe that "enculturation" differs from this, at least in degree: of necessity it is based on abilities and propensities that they already have, or it wouldn't work. There are also examples of higher primates imitating human behaviour that they find interesting or useful, without any prompting from us - the most striking example is the recently reported case of the spear-fishing orang-utan...so learning from us (as opposed to being modified by us) arguably falls withing the bounds of normal behaviour for these species.
 
Back
Top