• NEW! LOWEST RATES EVER -- SUPPORT THE SHOW AND ENJOY THE VERY BEST PREMIUM PARACAST EXPERIENCE! Welcome to The Paracast+, eight years young! For a low subscription fee, you can download the ad-free version of The Paracast and the exclusive, member-only, After The Paracast bonus podcast, featuring color commentary, exclusive interviews, the continuation of interviews that began on the main episode of The Paracast. We also offer lifetime memberships! Flash! Take advantage of our lowest rates ever! Act now! It's easier than ever to susbcribe! You can sign up right here!

    Subscribe to The Paracast Newsletter!

Wikileaks UFO Cable a HOAX

Forums New posts

Free episodes:

Anything from Cohen or ANW is BS. It isn't worth entertaining as even *possibly* true. If the day came that he posted something of genuine interest, other sites would've already picked up on it.

In it's own way, The Examiner is similar to ANW for publishing any old crap that could get site-traffic. I've been criticised once or twice for writing off some sites as disreputable and unreliable, but as far I know, if Obama is planning 'DISCLOSURE,' it won't be confined to a blog on the Examiner or a page on ANW.
 
All News Web, and the comments re micheal cohen are pretty close to the mark, he tends to go for quantity rather than quality in posting his "news"
 
I'll google all news web. I've never heard of it.

---------- Post added at 01:57 AM ---------- Previous post was at 01:53 AM ----------

Interesting. I just "liked" their facebook page so I can look at it a little more leisurely. Now, are y'all saying they are full of b.s. or reporting somebody full of b.s.?
 
tyder001 said:
I'll google all news web. I've never heard of it.

---------- Post added at 01:57 AM ---------- Previous post was at 01:53 AM ----------

Interesting. I just "liked" their facebook page so I can look at it a little more leisurely. Now, are y'all saying they are full of b.s. or reporting somebody full of b.s.?
Click to expand...

I've heard of it but I never go to the site so I don't know a lot about it. I read an introduction that Cohen wrote for a newer edition of Mack's Passport to the Cosmos. It was one of the flakiest things I've ever read (So much so that I immediately started researching it on the net. I thought it might be a joke, a parody of new age beliefs and perhaps the editors hadn't gotten the gag. That's completely what it seemed like. I think I might have posted on the MUFON board about it and was told, "Nope, it's no joke. That's how Cohen is all the time") and that was enough for me to know he was somebody I would never take seriously. Worse (And one of the most memorable because of how utterly ridiculous it was) introduction to a UFO book I've ever read. And at the time I had no idea who Cohen was. That was my introduction to him and that was enough.
 
I'm still playing catch up. So Cohen is the guy that runs that site? I know John Mack was a very credible person so was this a later edition? Anyway, thanks for the info. :-)
 
tyder001 said:
I'm still playing catch up. So Cohen is the guy that runs that site? I know John Mack was a very credible person so was this a later edition? Anyway, thanks for the info. :-)
Click to expand...

Yeah, I've got a newer edition of it and that is the one Cohen wrote his introduction for. Seriously, if I were to write a parody of new agers it would have looked a lot like what Cohen wrote for that book in all seriousness.

---------- Post added at 09:56 PM ---------- Previous post was at 09:43 PM ----------

Damn, was hoping Cohen's intro might be in Amazon's preview of the book. But alas, that part is cut out. It's too bad because it really is a great piece of comedy.
 
The rumor that Obama will make a UFO announcement soon is probably untrue. China News T.V. got its information straight from AllNewsWeb. In fact if you watch the China segment they showed AllNewsWeb as their only source. Mr. Cohen has a long reputation for making false claims, self inflated rumors, and flat out hoaxing. Richard Dolan, Leslie Kean and others have suggested staying away from AllNewsWeb.
 
RygyWa said:
It has been discovered that no such cable is in the Wikileaks archive. All cables so far have been released only to the Wikileaks archive and therefore it is impossible for Michael Cohen to have access. I find it highly doubtful that Wikileaks released this special UFO cable only to ANW.

http://www.ghosttheory.com/2011/01/19/wikileaks-ufo-cable-a-hoax
Click to expand...

Honestly I don't find this as surprising as most do in the slightest. Considering the fact that with billions of people in this world, govt. and military agents continuously leaking top secret information to the citizens of this and other countries over the years, everyone's interest in whether or not E.T. was ever in contact with or ever had anything to do with both the U.S. as well as any world govt.....once again nothing.

They leak information about top secret fubars. They leak information about Bush's mistakes, soldiers in Guantanamo Bay, the Rosenberg's, un-coded transmissions between embassy staff throughout the world.....but anything remotely pointing to E.T. or visitation or crashes found, or anything in the slightest, the answer is always, "one day disclosure will be", and "you'll see, the govt. will screw up and someone will "leak" out the truth"....but nothing ever ever even comes close to showing that their ever was or ever will be any E.T.'s out there or that they would even care that we "lowly apes" exist in the first place.

Why is it so hard for those of you who "have faith in" the existence of Extra-Terrestrial life actually look to this or any govt. to leak the information when you have such wonderful mediums and psychics like Dr. Boylan, Barbara Marciniak, and exceptional sites like this one for example:

Alien Galactic Press - Channeling News from Beyond the Human Intellectual Sphere

Faith is truly a difficult bedfellow is it not?
 
I am not trusting anything that comes from --Wikileaks-- , never mind AllNewsWeb. ( I have never heard of anw myself, until a couple days ago, on ATS. They sure make for a good distraction from who the real 'bad-guy' is, though, don't they.) I came across this article by one Webster Tarpley, that Wiki is and has been a psyop to push certain agendas.
http://tarpley.net/2011/01/20/wikileaks-cognitive-infiltration-operation/
But --I-- had come up with that suspiscion on my own, just as soon as I heard anti-Iran stuff oozing from there.
By-The-Way, I don't care, no matter what kind of form a longed-for "Disclosure" would appear as, IF it were to, I would instinctively and instantly --disbelieve-- , because there has been too much of this going on:
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/subterfuge

---------- Post added at 05:50 PM ---------- Previous post was at 05:30 PM -------
 
Simone_m said:
By-The-Way, I don't care, no matter what kind of form a longed-for "Disclosure" would appear as, IF it were to, I would instinctively and instantly --disbelieve-- , because there has been too much of this going on:
....subterfuge
Click to expand...

Disclosure may seek to further some agenda rather than just be informative for its own sake. Still, the government wouldn't disclose unless the proof of visitors were incontrovertible.
 
I don't know if anyone agrees with me here, but Wikileaks is being taken far too seriously by the press and people. I have heard BBC radio commentators saying that Wikileaks has changed the world and that secrets can no longer be kept!

This is ammusing to me because there have been no Top Secret documents been released. The security classifications are low. For me there is no proof that Wikileaks is the real deal and we must beware that Wikileaks is not controlled opposition and part of a social experiement to give the world a false sense of security.

On top of this we have Julian Assange. A man that has made several derogotory comments regarding UFO enthuisiasts, and buys into 100% the Offical 911 Commision Story. No matter what people think of that terrible day and no matter what your politics, the offical story is impossible and bunk. It goes beyond the reason of this post to go into this in any detail, but the offical story is false and can be proven.

One way to prove it is to read the book released by Kean & Hamilton, the two chairs of the 911 Commission a few years later. The chairs say the offical story is wrong!

Given Assanges loyalty to the offical story and that he is supposed to be against government secrets etc... This should make everyone nervous.
 
Back
Top