NEW! LOWEST RATES EVER -- SUPPORT THE SHOW AND ENJOY THE VERY BEST PREMIUM PARACAST EXPERIENCE! Welcome to The Paracast+, eight years young! For a low subscription fee, you can download the ad-free version of The Paracast and the exclusive, member-only, After The Paracast bonus podcast, featuring color commentary, exclusive interviews, the continuation of interviews that began on the main episode of The Paracast. We also offer lifetime memberships! Flash! Take advantage of our lowest rates ever! Act now! It's easier than ever to susbcribe! You can sign up right here!

Reply to thread

Message

Haha. You've made essentially three claims in this thread, all of which I've either refuted or shown to be questionable or irrelevant:

(1) Magnetism cannot be simulated.

I've shown that magnetism may be a physical process that can certainly be simulated.

(2) Real-world magnetism and simulated magnetism cannot interact.

Irrelevant.

(3) Magnetism and consciousness are similar.

Consciousness (subjectivity) is unlike any physical processes known the man, including magnetism.

Considering the global anticipation and subsequent global scientific coverage and attention this discovery received, not too mention that the waves were detected by two separate detectors, etc., etc., and with all due respect, I'm going to weight the analysis of the physics community over yours.

But of course, as with all empirical evidence, more will be needed. However, I expect Bohm's interpretation of QM to gain increasing mainstream attention.

<blockquote data-quote="Soupie" data-source="post: 240789" data-attributes="member: 6548">Haha. You&#039;ve made essentially three claims in this thread, all of which I&#039;ve either refuted or shown to be questionable or irrelevant:(1) Magnetism cannot be simulated.I&#039;ve shown that magnetism may be a physical process that can certainly be simulated.(2) Real-world magnetism and simulated magnetism cannot interact.Irrelevant.(3) Magnetism and consciousness are similar.Consciousness (subjectivity) is unlike any physical processes known the man, including magnetism.Considering the global anticipation and subsequent global scientific coverage and attention this discovery received, not too mention that the waves were detected by two separate detectors, etc., etc., and with all due respect, I&#039;m going to weight the analysis of the physics community over yours.But of course, as with all empirical evidence, more will be needed. However, I expect Bohm&#039;s interpretation of QM to gain increasing mainstream attention.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Soupie, post: 240789, member: 6548"] Haha. You've made essentially three claims in this thread, all of which I've either refuted or shown to be questionable or irrelevant: (1) Magnetism cannot be simulated. I've shown that magnetism may be a physical process that can certainly be simulated. (2) Real-world magnetism and simulated magnetism cannot interact. Irrelevant. (3) Magnetism and consciousness are similar. Consciousness (subjectivity) is unlike any physical processes known the man, including magnetism. Considering the global anticipation and subsequent global scientific coverage and attention this discovery received, not too mention that the waves were detected by two separate detectors, etc., etc., and with all due respect, I'm going to weight the analysis of the physics community over yours. But of course, as with all empirical evidence, more will be needed. However, I expect Bohm's interpretation of QM to gain increasing mainstream attention. [/QUOTE]

Verification