Lol, there are many cases considered "explained" despite the "explanation" being absurd or debunked. MOGUL is the classic examples; others include crash dummies and "swamp gas."
Burisch is a disinfo agent--one of many to appear over the years. What he says may be false but analysis of the purpose of disinfo can go a long way toward revealing the truth.
That's the way the phenomenon wants it. They deliberately limit the quality of evidence and even do things to sow some doubt about a sighting representing ET. Our visitors don't want the case for them to be too strong yet.
It's not sufficient to prove it conclusively--i.e. physical evidence in the public domain isn't--but it is highly suggestive of an unknown (or unearthly) phenomenon.
I neglected to answer this. If you're referring to pics of junk in Ramey's office, there are excellent grounds to doubt them. As records indicate #4 was cancelled, and even if the balloons released did reach the ranch--considered highly dubious--there was nothing else. Wherever they got the junk...
Like I just said, there's evidence for something extraordinary and for a confiscation of material, hence a coverup. I didn't say there was conclusive proof lay people are privy to.
Nobody, to my knowledge, ever claimed there were. Certainly nobody with the credibility of a base intel Major.
I didn't say witness testimony proved the phenomenon. But it's still evidence something highly unusual came down in '47 and its remains were confiscated and kept out of the public...