A fake plane was added for south tower explosion

[exo_doc]

Not wearing me down 7.............just my brain freakin' HURTS!

 

[williamjwhite]

I'm going to step into the backyard and engage in a p**sing contest with a skunk. Anybody wanna join me?

 

[Stagger Lee]

"Answer the question Claire" How did debris from two planes find it's way in the street's of ground 0 ? geez- just like the BM pin photo thread.

 

[Muadib]

It isn't just the debris either, it's also the DNA from the passengers of both planes that was mixed in with the debris from both planes. All of this has been extensively documented, serial numbers from the parts of the planes have been linked with the two flights that crashed into the towers as well. There is no way around this, unless you're willing to entertain some giant conspiracy that involves several teams who collected the passenger's DNA in advance and were running around New York that day planting it all over the scene, along with all of the parts from both planes, and yet nobody saw them. How anyone could seriously entertain this idea in the face of all of this conflicting evidence is beyond me, I guess there's really no getting around the need to believe in something, no matter how far fetched, impossible and idiotic it may be.

 

[Stagger Lee]

Cherry picking answers to questions? Makes for an disfunctional debate. Reminds me of ole Lance's sig "It all fits the pattern"

 

[7forever]

"Answer the question Claire" How did debris from two planes find it's way in the street's of ground 0 ? geez- just like the BM pin photo thread.

No, because claiming that an orb was a plane is the most ridiculous thing you've ever made. Why would they even use a plane? How outside of your own brain do you have to be to think that instead of the orb that is there throughout many broadcasts, there is a plane? There are a ton of pictures, a ton of video showing the most absurd fakery crashing into the towers. Just the mere thought that someone can be in such denial as to think there was a real plane is just mind boggling.

Then, to take a step further, you claim that there is NO evidence to the contrary. Are you serious? There is nothing but evidence to the contrary. If you think your point is ever proven by never using the fake blobs you call planes then you are just a chicken on all levels. Video proof substantiated by witnesses is the correct path to 911 truth. NO BOEINGS CRASHED IN NY ON 911.

 

[7forever]

[picture edited by moderator]

 

[Muadib]

Well, thanks for playing 7forever, but your obvious inability to address key aspects of the 9/11 tragedy continues to show just how hare brained and ridiculous your theory actually is. Apparently, for you, posting pictures of people pretending to jerk off (how is this still here, btw? is this kind of thing now acceptable on this site? what a shame) is what passes for rational debate. Bravo, and let me be probably not the first to tell you that this is why this little 9/11 theory of yours will go nowhere, exactly like your silly JFK theory. Enjoy obscurity and have a good day sir.

 

[7forever]

http://www.youtube.com/watc

The orb passed east of T1 only two seconds before T2 exploded. That obviously could not have been a plane because the west side of 2 was about 100 feet away at that point. There were only two possibilities had flight 175 really showed up. A real plane of any size would've crashed into the west of side of T2 or flew east of the towers entirely. NEITHER HAPPENED, therefore the weird object made turns that were only possible in a video game.

 

[Angel of Ioren]

Wow.

 

[7forever]

Wow is correct. No plane could make that turn or turns. Not enough of space or time. Impossiblities are abound with rejects who support 911 fiction.

 

[Angel of Ioren]

Wow is correct. No plane could make that turn or turns. Not enough of space or time. Impossiblities are abound with rejects who support 911 fiction.

No. Wow at the fact that you are kinda, sorta bonkers.

 

[Christopher O'Brien]

[picture edited by moderator]

lets keep it civil and sane, ok guys? Pretend jerk-off clips are not acceptable unless it's a thread about young boy's fantasy lives or something about juvenile sexual innuendo—I think I've made my point, now try and make yours without stooping too low, thanks in advance and although it may be hard, try and grow up 7 forever —chris

 

[Randall]

Boeing 767 Tires are between 46 and 52 inches in diameter. The tire in the photo doesn't look that big. That cross member on the scaffolding looks like it's barely at waist height. It makes the tire look not much bigger than a truck tire. It's obviously an airplane tire, but off a 767? I guess if you say so. I think I saw a video somewhere where someone figured out the dimensions of a tire in one of the other photos and tried to match it up to a 767, but they also worked it out as being too small. I don't think there's much doubt a plane hit the tower, but there are still some curiosities that haven't been fully explained. I'm not saying I have any answers though.

http://www.bridgestone.com/products/speciality_tires/aircraft/products/applications/pdf/tire_applications.pdf

 

[7forever]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GNLVxWUbPDU

I've shown a handful of people the orb and all said without hesitation that it wasn't a plane. The same type of replies would come from 90 percent of folks viewing this damning footage for the first time. They have no reason to deny reality or pretend that it could be a plane and that is what separates the few trolls online from the real world of 'believing what you're seeing'. Once a person understands the weird object passed east of the first tower only two seconds before the second tower explodes, their minds would confirm that it couldn't be a plane. Had it been a plane it would've either crashed into the side of T2 or flew past both towers. One could easily think the chopper clip was in slow motion but no, the orb was floating at a pace of 70-100 mph.

911truthncDotOrg 2 years ago
I found it very strange. She watched the explosion then acted like she wasn't positive about what she just witnessed. "It seems like it was in the other building from here". I am paraphrasing. No emotion at all.

It definitely does NOT look like an airliner.

zrocks2001 2 years ago
thats the ball she didnt even acknowledge that she saw a plane approaching she just saw an explosion in the other building.

imo there were bombs planted and a missle which is probably hard to see naked eyes if your not looking for it.

it sure didnt look like a plane

CuteCatFaith 2 years ago
It really looks small. It just doesn't look like a big commercial jet liner. She doesn't say, "Here comes a plane!" Bill Blackolive in Texas will be speaking on Mike Palacek's radio broadcast later this month. It has been postponed. Please read GUESTS OF THE NATION by Palacek. Thank you for posting this. Can anyone explain why the HOME RUN systems were not used to stop ANY of the "planes?"

CuteCatFaith 2 years ago
I went hysterical, which is incredibly rare for me. Shock reactions differ. Anyway, she doesn't say, wow, here comes a plane! Why do you think none of the HOME RUN systems kicked in on any of those planes? I hope you read GUESTS OF THE NATION by Mike Palacek.

Blake00711 1 year ago
She didn't even know that another aircraft had hit the south tower

 

[Randall]

I've shown a handful of people the orb and all said without hesitation that it wasn't a plane ...

Looks like a plane to me. It's just kind of odd because of the angle of the shot and the framing. At first it looks like something coming down from the top right, but it's not. It's coming toward the far side of the tower from out over the horizon, and there are frames where it seems like wings are visible. But does it look like a 767? I don't think so. Is the footage genuine? I don't know that either. Do we know the whole truth about 911 WTC attacks? I don't think so. Will we ever? Probably not in this century. Does that automatically mean it's an evil government conspiracy? I really doubt it. If there is any secrecy on the part of the US Government there's probably a good reason for it.

 

[7forever]

She (WB11) first described it as what could be a police helicopter and after she realized it caused the explosion, changed her thoughts in that moment. The media literally got trapped in the twilight zone. If it wasn't a helicopter, (no propeller) it certainly could not have been a plane. A chopper (From WB11) passed west after the orb came from the right/west side.

The orb was the orb, helicopters are helicopters and the computer generated imagery utilized on 911 was absurd. The camera zoom demonstrates how a distant object will show more character detail. The zoom on the orb shows no detail of any known flying object and is too small to even be a chopper.

 

[cottonzway]

The "no plane" nonsense is the dumbest thing I ever heard. People have to be trolling. I hope, at least.

 

[7forever]

You can clearly see that I took a real picture of a distant plane and it looks real because it is. The black blob in Cloud's video is obviously fake. It's black with no tail section, no wings, no fuselage, nothing but stupid fakery. The light poles render perfect silver with a black blob just west.

 

[7forever]

Cherry picking answers to questions? Makes for an disfunctional debate. Reminds me of ole Lance's sig "It all fits the pattern"

The only vestige of the 9/11 fiction movement is populated with people who are insecure and self absorbed. For them, it's not about truth, or science, or the live broadcasts which prove no planes. Its about them. It's about their fears. It's about their shortcomings. It's about their failures.

The idea of 19 hijackers successfully duping the most powerful nation in the world (EVEN THOUGH MANY WERE ACTUALLY FOUND ALIVE AND NOT INVOLVED IN 911) is patently absurd and was never proven by anyone in the government, mass media or anyone online. They can't make sense out of something that simply never happened. It's a way for them to assuage their fear of facts they cannot refute. It's a way for them to come to terms with the fact that they are not in control; at least their stupid belief in government garbage is accepted by most americans.

If you notice, the official conspiracy itself isn't all that important. They don't bother to actually support a single narrative. It's their delusional demand that the official faked story provided by a complicit mass media is true because they desperately want it to be, even though obvious evidence of assinine video fakery aired on live tv and many amateur shots that showed up later. And so they'll say and do any nonsensical thing they can think of to try and convince themselves that the thing they understand is true simply cannot be. NO BOEING WAS CAPTURED BY ANY CAMERA ON 911 CLOSE TO ANY BUILDING WHEN IT EXPLODED.