• NEW! LOWEST RATES EVER -- SUPPORT THE SHOW AND ENJOY THE VERY BEST PREMIUM PARACAST EXPERIENCE! Welcome to The Paracast+, eight years young! For a low subscription fee, you can download the ad-free version of The Paracast and the exclusive, member-only, After The Paracast bonus podcast, featuring color commentary, exclusive interviews, the continuation of interviews that began on the main episode of The Paracast. We also offer lifetime memberships! Flash! Take advantage of our lowest rates ever! Act now! It's easier than ever to susbcribe! You can sign up right here!

    Subscribe to The Paracast Newsletter!

A Surprising Visit from a Loved One - I think

Free episodes:

Status
Not open for further replies.
ok here you go.
 

Attachments

  • smoke_exp_lookslikedad4.jpg
    smoke_exp_lookslikedad4.jpg
    28.2 KB · Views: 33
another at 40%
 

Attachments

  • smoke_exp_lookslikedad5.jpg
    smoke_exp_lookslikedad5.jpg
    28.7 KB · Views: 32
pixelsmith,

As I suspected, the overlay looks like Bernie Madoff. ;)

But seriously, while I can get a sense of what you mean, I'm still not thinking that AA is purposely faking it. Just my opinion.

dB
 
pixelsmith,

As I suspected, the overlay looks like Bernie Madoff. ;)

But seriously, while I can get a sense of what you mean, I'm still not thinking that AA is purposely faking it. Just my opinion.

dB

the more i work with it the more i believe it is fake.
now i must get back to work.

i remain skeptical. sorry AA. just my opinion.
 
I'm just happy that some are seeing a resemblance because no one would be analyzing it like what's being done here if that was not the case.
I don't know what else to say except that I'm not in any way trying to fool anybody. The image (that face formation) is what I said it is -- you can take it or leave it but I can't blame anyone for thinking otherwise because it is, afterall, rather inexplicable.
 
being a photographer i will also point out that this image probably didnt last more that a split second. are you saying you were shooting frame after frame in succession to hopefully capture this image or did it in fact hang around and wait for you to shoot it?
 
being a photographer i will also point out that this image probably didnt last more that a split second. are you saying you were shooting frame after frame in succession to hopefully capture this image or did it in fact hang around and wait for you to shoot it?

Pixelsmith, I'm sorry but I think it's in my own best interest to not engage in any further conversation with you in this thread... but best of luck with your photography career and I mean that from the bottom of my heart. :)
 
being a photographer i will also point out that this image probably didnt last more that a split second. are you saying you were shooting frame after frame in succession to hopefully capture this image or did it in fact hang around and wait for you to shoot it?

Pixelsmith, I'm sorry but I think it's in my own best interest to not engage in any further conversation with you in this thread... but best of luck with your photography career and I mean that from the bottom of my heart. :)

Methinks thou stumpeth her, pixel.

Actually, she probably took video and then went through it frame by frame. That is probably why the resolution is so low.
 
Yes... it's a frameshot from the video I recorded during that dry ice fog session.


What did I say before?? I think I said it was a snapshot.. well, that's what it is. But if you want to be more specific, it's a frameshot too. No intention on my part to mislead anyone.
 
Lol, I must be a glutton for punishment but while I'm at it, might as well show the following material. Already had it uploaded on my server so.....
---------------------------------------------------------------------

Here's a snapshot (frameshot) of another face that showed up in a video I recorded one time where I directed the cam to the screen of my tv set. It was set on a between station with nothing on the screen except static but when I viewed the short vid back frame by frame I saw the face of the deceased son of a friend of mine. I am in contact quite often with that spirit or intelligence who claims to be that person.

At any rate, I get a lot of stuff like this in my experimentations in this area...

In the image below, top image shows the static tv screen and on the right is that person's photo and on the left in the red box shows his face in the static.

The image below the first one is also that individual which again is from my tv screen only that time it showed only the top of this face in the static on the screen i.e, eyebrows, eye's, forehead.

But once again, these may only be other unknown intelligences who are posing as those whom I am in contact with -- we will never know for sure....

jrblwh.png
 
Ok Annie, tell me that last one was a joke. Pls tell me it was (finger hovering over ignore button, waiting for your answer).
 
Annie, I gotta say, I'm totally with Bob on this one. You're seeing things in the noise - literally. This way lies the dark side. Please, please tell us you're joking, or I'll have to warn you, you're going to lose pretty much all credibility with any self-respecting Paracaster.

dB
 
I agree that it's difficult to see anything in that static and I only tried that technique out a few times years ago when I was first starting out.
I have much better faces/images where I used other techniques that were much, much better than the static screen technique but only showed that one here because I already had it handy on my server.
 
1asmall.jpg



The image above is from a short video I recorded, once again of my tv screen on a between station. It's a woman in a veil and in the video one can see her wink.
This one is my best out of all of them.
I still have that video and will upload it to You Tube this evening. But once again, she just popped up out of the blue on the empty screen.

Below is another screenshot of the same face. Notice the painterly quality of these images. This is not unusual for this type of phenomenon.

4asmall.jpg
 
sorry AA, you lost me...i remain highly skeptical. i truly believe the first photo..er... video frame capture is photoshopped. a good share of my work involves photo restoration, i am very sensitive to detecting cloning tracks (repetitive images) , i see lots of them in your image while utilizing the levels and curves adjustments. OR... it may be possible your dad is using Adobe VaporShop in the after world in order to communicate with you. :D;)
 
I can't locate the original AVI movie I recorded of that "lady in the veil" but I do have a very poor quality Flash version of the same clip. Unfortunately it will look even worse if I post it on You Tube so
instead, I will insert the frames of that Flash version on a webpage in case anyone is interested in viewing them. :)

Also, I just wanted to add that I sent those images of that lady in the veil to some of the top Instrumental Transcommunication (ITC) experts in the world.
Below are the responses from two well known ITC experts in regards to those images of the lady in the veil that I sent to them. I received responses back from others too but have since deleted them. The two below are the only ones I left in my email box. I blocked out my real first name in each email for privacy reasons.

emailsfrompj&Rolf.png
 
sorry AA, you lost me...i remain highly skeptical. i truly believe the first photo..er... video frame capture is photoshopped. a good share of my work involves photo restoration, i am very sensitive to detecting cloning tracks (repetitive images) , i see lots of them in your image while utilizing the levels and curves adjustments. OR... it may be possible your dad is using Adobe VaporShop in the after world in order to communicate with you. :D;)


Show me where you are seeing cloning tracks. I really, really would love to see them!
Also, nothing has been photoshopped but you are going to have to prove that too. You are making all of these accusations that my images are fake and that I am a liar yet you are too lazy to even show us those things you are accusing me of.

I'm more than willing to take a lie detector test to prove that my images are real but you would have to pay for that. Let us know ok?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top