NEW! LOWEST RATES EVER -- SUPPORT THE SHOW AND ENJOY THE VERY BEST PREMIUM PARACAST EXPERIENCE! Welcome to The Paracast+, eight years young! For a low subscription fee, you can download the ad-free version of The Paracast and the exclusive, member-only, After The Paracast bonus podcast, featuring color commentary, exclusive interviews, the continuation of interviews that began on the main episode of The Paracast. We also offer lifetime memberships! Flash! Take advantage of our lowest rates ever! Act now! It's easier than ever to susbcribe! You can sign up right here!
I doubt any of us will ever find that answer but I enjoy trying and it's why I listen to the Paracast.Why? I have not found answer to that one.
Absolutely true.Yes but that goes back to the 60s as do the alien abduction phenomenon,not all priests are bad People my point is that psychologically people substitute things they can not cope with.
Also, regarding the so-called "abductees", a diagnosed, undiagnosed, or untreated mental illness such as schizophrenia can produce hallucinations and psychotic episodes.I think that's correct and all the evidence in my opinion points to that.
Well, I have to agree, perhaps Hickson and Parker did miss their calling - they should be in Hollywood, at least advisors or consultants to any forthcoming movie - though even Travis Walton said that many scenes in "Fire In The Sky" were fabricated.I'm not an official investigator. My information comes from the literature--works by Hopkins, Blum, Fuller and more recently Friedman (Captured! ). I suggest skeptics become acquainted with the pertinent research before posting here. Btw there's also the late Dr. Leir.
You mean investigators have determined that these abductees, and a host of others, had these issues?? Were the Hills on drugs or get drunk?? As for lying, a policeman said of Hickson and Parker: "Those guys are either telling the truth or they should be in Hollywood."
Not according to descriptions I've read. Skeptics have their share of credibility issues, and then some.Yea there was actually a documentary done on this in the UK, the little things that Dr Lier was taking out were particale build ups of debris that we all get throughout our life times.
Reminds me of the attitude Friedman attributed to skeptics: "Don't bother me with the facts my mind is made up." To reject a point of view no matter what evidence might be presented is worse than nonscientific.Listen think what you want nothing will ever convince me that Aliens are or ever have been here.
Stan was a nice man but lost his connection with reality. Roswell never happened, Kathleen Marden just wanted to cash in on her aunt's fame.Reminds me of the attitude Friedman attributed to skeptics: "Don't bother me with the facts my mind is made up." To reject a point of view no matter what evidence might be presented is worse than nonscientific.
Well, I have to agree, perhaps Hickson and Parker did miss their calling - they should be in Hollywood,
A movie needn't be an accurate rendition of his account.though even Travis Walton said that many scenes in "Fire In The Sky" were fabricated.
But I don't believe implants are really tracking devices. The Alien Grand Design has a nice take on this.For example, the objects were analyzed by the New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology, which determined that they were "composed of commonly found elements", such as iron or aluminum.
See Roswell in the 21st Century. KDR expresses some doubts about an ET explanation but emphatically rejects MOGUL. Something definitely happened.Stan was a nice man but lost his connection with reality. Roswell never happened, Kathleen Marden just wanted to cash in on her aunt's fame.