• NEW! LOWEST RATES EVER -- SUPPORT THE SHOW AND ENJOY THE VERY BEST PREMIUM PARACAST EXPERIENCE! Welcome to The Paracast+, eight years young! For a low subscription fee, you can download the ad-free version of The Paracast and the exclusive, member-only, After The Paracast bonus podcast, featuring color commentary, exclusive interviews, the continuation of interviews that began on the main episode of The Paracast. We also offer lifetime memberships! Flash! Take advantage of our lowest rates ever! Act now! It's easier than ever to susbcribe! You can sign up right here!

    Subscribe to The Paracast Newsletter!

andrew basiago hard evidence

Free episodes:

Bob Watson

Paranormal Adept
ok this is in response to statments made on a diffrent thread.
I have shown thu historical evidence that mr basiago statments on time traveling to gettysburg is 100% impossable. that thu his own words Mr Basiago has shown an ignorance of the events as they happened.
there fore i create this seprate thread to give his supporters the chance to prove me wrong.
I want anyone who beleves that this man is telling the truth to post here evidence to suport his claims
rules
DON'T post his claims post evidence
all written statments must be made under penilty of pergiry
any physical evidence must be authentic and have 3 statements that such is a true and correct evidence.
finally I demand to see any recovered goverment files that support the existance of this so called secret project.
there we go i make the challange now its time to back up your statmets you know who you are !so the ball is in your court! I don't have anything to prove YOU DO!
TAG YOUR IT!
 
Oh PLEASSSSSSE!!!! If, and I do mean a really BIG IF there were such a government project .... (pure bullshit of course ... fricken time travel) 1st ... would they use a kid???? And next ... if there were such a thing as time travel within the American government ... (once again .. pure bullshit!!!!) would they let the moron ( spell that MORON) go public with it?????? And ... he went with Obama?????? Why? How was Obama important then?

This MORON Basiago ... rates a fricken' Wake Up call ....

Decker
 
Oh PLEASSSSSSE!!!! If, and I do mean a really BIG IF there were such a government project .... (pure bullshit of course ... fricken time travel) 1st ... would they use a kid???? And next ... if there were such a thing as time travel within the American government ... (once again .. pure bullshit!!!!) would they let the moron ( spell that MORON) go public with it?????? And ... he went with Obama?????? Why? How was Obama important then?

This MORON Basiago ... rates a fricken' Wake Up call ....

Decker
100% agree here but there is some who say he is real I want to give them the chance to prove me wrong!
 
It is almost as though Dan Burisch sold the franchise to his special kind of crazy to Basiago then retired. Basiago as a child agent of a secret organization complete with time travel and trips through outer space is science fiction oriented toward pre-teens like early Heinlein novels and modern Spy Kids movies. That this guy gets speaking engagements is remarkable.
 

for the record please note during this he at NO time mentions any other speaker other than lincoln.
the truth is that lincoln spoke after edward everatt who spoke for TWO HOURS!!! so we got 2 picks here.
1 he did not notice or metion the man speaking for 2 hours
2 he was not there and cherry picked his farie story...
 
Now I wonder if these things won't work their way into his presentation in the future. You may be giving him new material.

What gets me about this sort of thing is why doesn't the guy just write this up as a novel, a screenplay, or a children's book and actually sell it that way? A time traveling father and son team having adventures. There are markets for that sort of thing. What possible advantage does pitching all this as something that actually happened to him (whether it actually did being irrelevant for the moment) have? Pitching it as real severely limits your potential audience for any number of reasons. It could be a Adamski-like situation where this may have been attempted first and he found no takers and re-framed the material and took it to the paranormal/UFO talk show circuit where standards are slightly different.
 
Can you imagine Basiago on the Paracast?

Why would you care? You have already admitted to knowing little to nothing about Basiago.

I would welcome him to Paracast, apparently Paracast doesn't want to take on a serious conversation with Basiago. I find this remarkably duplicitous.

Put him on.

Truth is simple.
 
Why would you care? You have already admitted to knowing not little to nothing about Basiago.

I would welcome him to Paracast, apparently Paracast doesn't want to take on a serious conversation with Basiago. I find this remarkably duplicitous.

Put him on.

Truth is simple.

post you evidice my man post it here do it prove it ! prove me wrong1 prove US wrong I want evidance not some mans fairie tale POST E V I D E N C E!!!
 
Why would you care? You have already admitted to knowing not little to nothing about Basiago.

I would welcome him to Paracast, apparently Paracast doesn't want to take on a serious conversation with Basiago. I find this remarkably duplicitous.

Put him on.

Truth is simple.


I don't know if that is duplicitous. It is true that anyone could be a guest on the show and they would stand or fall by what they say and the answers they give. Fine, no argument there.

However, in defence of the show, I would say that there are countless people trying to peddle their wild story and they seldom have any evidence to back up their claims. The show could waste episode after episode trying to cross examine every whacky story that comes along but I think, personally, that this show tries harder than most to present guests who have at least some evidence to back up their claims. No doubt that isn't always true and I'm sure it isn't hard to find exceptions to this 'rule', so if I may presume to speak for the show:eek:, yes they could have this Basiago guy on but anyone who does a little research will find out there is zero evidence for these claims. That is not the case say, with Friedman or Randle discussing their own take on Roswell - at least they try to provide evidence to back up their claims.

Actually, I would love to hear this guy on the show but it ain't my show and it's not up to me!
 
Back
Top