NEW! LOWEST RATES EVER -- SUPPORT THE SHOW AND ENJOY THE VERY BEST PREMIUM PARACAST EXPERIENCE! Welcome to The Paracast+, eight years young! For a low subscription fee, you can download the ad-free version of The Paracast and the exclusive, member-only, After The Paracast bonus podcast, featuring color commentary, exclusive interviews, the continuation of interviews that began on the main episode of The Paracast. We also offer lifetime memberships! Flash! Take advantage of our lowest rates ever! Act now! It's easier than ever to susbcribe! You can sign up right here!
What do you think might be on the way?I thought Greg's read on the Simonton/Eagle River case was very intriguing. If these encounters are indeed meant to make us think and their modeus operandi seems to be evolving (or maybe devolving) I am a little concerned what will be the next step to get our attention.
Greg, since you're responding to posts here, do you have a table of contents for your new book posted somewhere online? It would also be nice to read the first paragraph for each chapter or essay or a brief description of its subject matter.
Also, why is your comments section at RM not taking new comments for Cassidy or Aubeck? There is a weird error message that is given, and the new comment is never posted. This error is given after passing the "robot test" and attempting to post, but the comment message still does not post.
I was at the actual Farmer's Market at 3rd and Fairfax, just having lunch.Greg, is the farmers market you were at the one on Fairfax (Sunday flea market) do you have a booth you are setting up for the time being?
Yes he was, but I don't think he had anything to do with it, if that is what you are implying.Regarding Greg's upstairs spook was Jim Mosley alive at the time ?
i always enjoy having Greg on the show as he's an exceptional conversationalist about the subject matter. it's always a pleasure to have him expound just on his own ideas. i was worried at first that we weren't going to delve too deeply into the book, It Defies Language, but this episode did manage to look at a bunch of topics with a good flavour of what it offers.
The discussion about Dale Spaur who lost job, family, wife and then i believe we heard fell down an elevator shaft and broke his spine - it was a deconstructed life to be certain. I believe though the Saucer's name was Floyd, was it not? Dale had a relationship with the saucer that lasted long after his initial sighting. What are we to make of this?
We are our own technological wizards, immature at the craft but we work at it. Greg reminds us that thinking divergently about the phenomena holds the best possibility of being able to understand it a little better. So far the tried and true methods have yielded little in way of actual physical evidence up against the incredible number of sightings. That fact alone should make us think more carefully about what is actually transpiring in the skies that are seen inside our minds with strange objects flying around in them and with weird humanoids that walk out to collect a few samples.
More discussions, please, about this kind of offbeat and creative manner of thinking about the subject, as the field needs a new direction given its lack of accomplishments over the decades. The only really interesting thing to come out of ufology has been the creative thinking about the subject: Keel, Vallee, Michel, Tonnies, Bishop, Duensing all are truly creative thinkers and only two are still alive. We need to grow this capacity. It continues to be positive to hear about RPJ being promoted on the show as well, for he really represents that next generation of UFO thinkers who are in the wings waiting to spring out a whole new way of thinking about the field as Tonnies did.
i always enjoy having Greg on the show as he's an exceptional conversationalist about the subject matter. it's always a pleasure to have him expound just on his own ideas. i was worried at first that we weren't going to delve too deeply into the book, It Defies Language, but this episode did manage to look at a bunch of topics with a good flavour of what it offers. I've been reading it this past couple weeks and it really is what Chris O'Brien described it as in ATP. It is an exceptional and important book in the field. People need to pick it up as it offers such a wide variety of insights into the phenomena and covers quite a breadth of history and the issues that are to be found in the wild world of ufo's and paranormality. it's a very concentrated book that is easy to digest and yet totally thought provoking.
What makes it very accessible is that it is told in short bites, briefer essays collected together under a number of different themes. The theory section is my favourite, where he throws a lot of things at the wall to see what sticks. The ideas around co-creation, UFO's as a cosmic art project, and UFO's as a social deconstruction cue are all worth pursuit. We heard a little about that deconstruction on this past episode. The discussion about Dale Spaur who lost job, family, wife and then i believe we heard fell down an elevator shaft and broke his spine - it was a deconstructed life to be certain. I believe though the Saucer's name was Floyd, was it not? Dale had a relationship with the saucer that lasted long after his initial sighting. What are we to make of this?
How is it the UFO can have such a profound impact on witnesses? Is this witness specific and more about people who are already experiencing some kind of personal deconstruction and destabilization taking place as Bruce Duensing suggested or is it simply about proximity and the superlative nature of the experience of being close to something so wildly impossible. Maybe these things really are from a realm so vastly different than our own that the Nuts and Bolts concept doesn't even come close to beginning to be able to explain what they are.
It was great to be reminded of a couple of ufological points on this episode. Flying Saucers Are Here To Make Us Think - and so they are, and so they do. There's something incredibly creative about that whole idea; UFO's are a kind of stimulus to human curiosity. This always gets our imagination flowing and in this way the UFO strikes me as a kind of invitation of sorts, not necessarily to get off planet as Chris often suggests but perhaps more about just being able to imagine the different possibilities of what reality actually is or learning to better understand our own limits and how to overcome them, as we often attempt and succeed at doing. We were also reminded how important is to think oddly and divergently about the phenomena - i wanted to hear even more about those modes on this show.
We are our own technological wizards, immature at the craft but we work at it. Greg reminds us that thinking divergently about the phenomena holds the best possibility of being able to understand it a little better. So far the tried and true methods have yielded little in way of actual physical evidence up against the incredible number of sightings. That fact alone should make us think more carefully about what is actually transpiring in the skies that are seen inside our minds with strange objects flying around in them and with weird humanoids that walk out to collect a few samples.
Greg's closing chapter on Asemic writing and Alien writing is classic Misterioso strangeness and worth the read on its own. I can understand why the book closes with this as this really is our own creative response to the phenomena and is a kind of collaborative product that descends directly from automatic writing and Dadaist art practices of the automatic artist, in touch with something beyond themselves and relaying their received transmission back to the rest of us. More discussions, please, about this kind of offbeat and creative manner of thinking about the subject, as the field needs a new direction given its lack of accomplishments over the decades. The only really interesting thing to come out of ufology has been the creative thinking about the subject: Keel, Vallee, Michel, Tonnies, Bishop, Duensing all are truly creative thinkers and only two are still alive. We need to grow this capacity. It continues to be positive to hear about RPJ being promoted on the show as well, for he really represents that next generation of UFO thinkers who are in the wings waiting to spring out a whole new way of thinking about the field as Tonnies did.